
Each few years we hear the identical lament: individuals learn lower than they used to. Consideration fragments. Lengthy novels collect mud. Bookstores wrestle. The digital scroll wins.
And but, literary festivals — in India and much past — are fuller than ever.
I’ve attended sufficient of them lately to note the paradox. What I can’t but determine is what it means.
Few years in the past, I attended the Kumaun Literary Pageant held in Nainital. The setting was beneficiant — hills framing the venue, a sure old-world ease softening the logistics. The lawns had been full. Conversations flowed between classes. Bookstalls displayed their wares with disciplined optimism.
My very own e-book lay on a kind of tables, backbone outward. It was not a part of any dialogue. I used to be neither shocked nor offended. Festivals are curated ecosystems; they privilege visibility and resonance. Nonetheless, the element lingered. Show will not be discourse. Presence will not be participation.
The biggest gatherings weren’t for novelists or essayists. Sachin Pilot talking on secularism drew an animated crowd. Manisha Koirala reflecting on her wrestle with most cancers obtained lengthy applause. Telephones had been raised. Questions had been energetic.
In the meantime, skilled writers — those that reside inside language — typically addressed thinner audiences. Their classes had been considerate, generally demanding. Attendance was quieter.
The competition felt as a lot social as literary. Introductions had been exchanged with familiarity. Networks overlapped. Good meals circulated. Literature shared the stage with visibility.
Months later, in California, I attended the South Asian Literary Pageant. The geography had modified; the sample had not.
The venue was an unlimited open garden beneath delicate solar, rows of chairs stretching again from a big outside stage. Across the perimeter had been stalls promoting books, handicrafts, jewelry, regional snacks. Households arrived in teams. Conversations mingled with the scent of chai.
Probably the most recognisable audio system had been positioned on the principle stage. Konkona Sen drew a big viewers. Amitav Ghosh commanded severe engagement. Shobhaa De added performative aptitude. The garden crammed early; latecomers stood alongside the sides.
Smaller classes that includes much less seen writers had been held indoors. Attendance there was modest.
Standing on that garden, I realised the gathering was not merely literary. For the diaspora particularly, it was cultural affirmation. One might transfer from a panel dialogue to a meals stall to a craft desk with out ever leaving the orbit of “literature,” even when books weren’t the only real centre of gravity.
Extra lately, in Delhi, I attended the India As we speak Literature Pageant. The ticket worth was modest, however turnout was overwhelming. Seating crammed rapidly. Giant LED screens ensured that even these seated removed from the stage might watch clearly.
The superstar presence was unmistakable. Poet Kumar Vishwas drew loud applause. Piyush Mishra held the viewers with theatrical ease. Rahgir introduced music into the programme. Smriti Irani attracted a charged crowd. VIP enclosures and managed motion made hierarchies seen even inside a “public” occasion.
Once more, recognisable figures crammed halls. Much less seen writers spoke to fewer listeners.
Throughout Nainital’s curated hills, California’s expansive garden, and Delhi’s high-energy auditorium, a sample repeated itself — although by no means in an identical kind.
We is probably not assembling round books. We could also be assembling across the concept of books.
If studying habits are thinning, why are literary festivals thriving?
Maybe the reply lies in what these festivals now present.
Studying is solitary. It calls for time, inwardness, endurance. A competition is social. It affords gathering, shared consideration, participation.
To learn is to sit down alone with a textual content.
To attend a competition is to inhabit a public second.
The e-book stays solitary. The competition is collective.
For just a few hours, one will not be confined to 1’s skilled id. One listens to conversations about politics, mortality, local weather, tradition. One performs engagement. One belongs.
Attendance itself now carries cultural worth. It alerts consciousness. It situates one inside a discourse. I can’t exclude myself from this sociology. I’ve thought-about attending the Jaipur Literature Pageant — partly to hearken to severe conversations, partly, if I’m sincere, to really feel included in that circle. Premium passes can value practically $200 a day. Entry is tiered. Presence itself is stratified.
Literary festivals today resemble cultural ecosystems — part conversation, part spectacle, part marketplace. Food stalls, craft displays, LED screens, security protocols, sponsor branding — the architecture emphasises gathering over solitude.
None of this renders them hollow. A single session can provoke thought long after the applause fades. A live conversation can linger in ways a hurriedly skimmed page may not. Even if only a fraction of attendees return home and read more deeply, something meaningful has occurred.
But the shift is unmistakable.
We may be engaging differently. We may be consuming ideas in curated bursts rather than sustained immersion. The stage has become as important as the page.
The crowds suggest hunger.
The thinning pages suggest distraction.
Between the two lies a quiet question about how intellectual life is now experienced.
Whether these assemblies lead us back to deeper reading — or gradually replace it — remains open.
For now, the lawns are full.
The books wait.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Get the latest CounterCurrents updates delivered straight to your inbox.