Good morning. It’s Saturday, Oct. 19. Right here’s what we’ve been doing in Opinion.
The Occasions’ editorial board has completed making its endorsements for the November basic election; you’ll find the whole listing of suggestions here and a abstract beneath.
However earlier than we get to that, let me simply say this: I full-throatedly encourage you to learn the endorsements and severely take into account them. This has nothing to do with the rightness (or wrongness, relying in your view) of the positions, however with who makes the suggestions and the method they use. Our editorial board consists of skilled, award-winning journalists who interview the candidates (together with, sure, these operating for choose) and painstakingly analysis the poll initiatives. You’d have a more durable time discovering anybody making extra knowledgeable selections on elections than our editorial board members.
And sure, you would possibly weigh all of the info rigorously and are available to a special conclusion. I do know this, as a result of so typically throughout endorsements season, readers inform us they’ll use our listing as suggestions for the way not to vote. So if you happen to’ve already begun typing that message in reply to this text, another person in all probability already beat you to it.
However if you happen to disagree after taking the time to learn the endorsements, then you definitely not less than realized one thing. The problems and candidates thought-about in elections are sometimes not simply one-offs — in any case, how typically have we voted on same-sex marriage (Proposition 3 this 12 months) and felony justice (Proposition 36 this 12 months)? To borrow a phrase from one of many presidential candidates, these office-seekers and poll measures didn’t simply fall out of a coconut tree; they exist in context, and familiarizing your self with them, together with the arguments for and in opposition to, higher prepares you to vote in each election down the road.
With that, right here is the listing of endorsements for the election ending Nov. 5.
Statewide races
Proposition 2: Yes on a $10-billion bond for repairs at public faculties and group faculties.
Proposition 3: Yes to eradicating bigotry in opposition to same-sex {couples} from the California Structure.
Proposition 4: Yes on a $10-billion climate-change response bond.
Proposition 5: Yes to lowering the edge for passing native bond measures from two-thirds to 55%.
Proposition 6: Yes to eradicating language from the state Structure allowing compelled labor for prisoners.
Proposition 32: Yes to giving a modest elevate to the state’s lowest-paid staff.
Proposition 33: No on a rent-control measure that might worsen the state’s housing scarcity.
Proposition 35: No to sophisticated Medi-Cal policymaking by poll initiative.
Proposition 36: No on a tough-on-crime revival of the disastrous conflict on medicine.
Having fun with this text? Think about subscribing to the Los Angeles Occasions
Your assist helps us ship the information that issues most. Become a subscriber.
Los Angeles Metropolis
City Council District 2: Adrin Nazarian
City Council District 10: Heather Hutt
City Council District 14: Ysabel Jurado
Charter Amendment DD: Yes to creating an unbiased redistricting fee so Metropolis Council members can’t select their very own voters.
Charter Amendment LL: Yes to creating an unbiased redistricting fee for the L.A. Unified Faculty District Board of Schooling.
Charter Amendment HH: Yes on a group of good-government modifications to the L.A. Metropolis Constitution.
Charter Amendment II: Yes to creating sure metropolis operations extra environment friendly.
Charter Amendment ER: Yes to strengthening Los Angeles’ Ethics Fee.
Charter Amendment FF: No on a pension giveaway throughout a funds disaster.
Los Angeles County
District Attorney: George Gascón
Measure A: Yes to changing a quarter-cent gross sales tax with a half-cent gross sales tax for homeless housing and providers.
Measure E: Yes on a property tax enhance to pay for fireplace and emergency medical providers within the Consolidated Hearth Safety District of Los Angeles County.
Measure G: Yes to increasing the Board of Supervisors to make county authorities extra responsive and consultant.
Seat 1: Andra Hoffman
Seat 3: David Vela
Seat 5: Nichelle Henderson
Seat 7: Kelsey Iino
L.A. Unified Faculty District
School Board District 1: Sherlett Hendy Newbill
School Board District 3: Scott Schmerelson
School Board District 5: Karla Griego
Measure US: Yes on a $9-billion bond to deal with a development backlog within the college district.
L.A. County Superior Courtroom judges
Office No. 39: Steve Napolitano
Office No. 48: Ericka J. Wiley
Office No. 97: Sharon Ransom
Office No. 135: Steven Yee Mac
Office No. 137: Tracey M. Blount
California Legislature
Assembly District 52: Jessica Caloza
Assembly District 54: Mark Gonzalez
Assembly District 57: Sade Elhawary
Senate District 35: Michelle Chambers
U.S. Home and Senate
U.S. Senator: Adam B. Schiff
27th Congressional District: George Whitesides
30th Congressional District: Laura Friedman
45th Congressional District: Derek Tran
47th Congressional District: Dave Min
Extra from opinion
From our columnists
From visitor contributors
From the Editorial Board
Letters to the Editor