NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!
Democratic presidential candidate present Vice President Kamala Harris used the phrase “freedom” 11 occasions in a marketing campaign speech this week, emphasizing, as she does repeatedly, the “freedom of a lady to have the ability to make choices about her personal physique.”
It’s the most recent instance of how, in line with ABC News and The New Yorker, Democrats are trying to take possession of the phrase “freedom.” The New Yorker explains: “Democrats’ years-long efforts to reclaim the phrase are cresting on this 12 months’s Presidential race.”
It actually takes some nerve for Democrats to try to revamp as “freedom” their standard proposals on not simply abortion and voting, but in addition gun management, local weather and LGBT points. In actuality, Democrats goal to limit our First and Second Modification rights and extra.
CNN HOST KASIE HUNT SAYS HARRIS IS ‘REPUBLICAN’ AND TRUMP IS ‘LIBERAL’ ON THEIR ECONOMIC POLICIES
Harris has made “freedom” the theme of her marketing campaign. She says the phrase steadily in her speeches. Her marketing campaign’s tune is “Freedom” by Beyoncé. The phrase “freedom” seems 24 occasions in her marketing campaign web site’s points part. Freedom was emphasised in her first marketing campaign video and in her speech on the Democrats’ conference.
“On this election, many basic freedoms are at stake,” Harris’s marketing campaign web site says. Harris and working mate Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz “will at all times struggle for the liberty to breathe clear air, drink clear water, and reside free from the air pollution that fuels the local weather disaster,” in line with their marketing campaign web site.
Harris’s presidential marketing campaign web site’s coverage part makes no point out of our most vital freedoms, enshrined within the First Modification — the “free train” of faith, “freedom of speech, or of the press” (former President Donald Trump’s marketing campaign does). Somebody ought to inform the Democrats that these are first within the Invoice of Rights for a motive.
Walz has stated he sees “no assure without spending a dime speech” associated to misinformation and hate speech. However such speech is constitutionally protected, in any other case the federal government could be within the place of regulating what is suitable speech and it may suppress dissent or label info it doesn’t like as “misinformation.”
The higher strategy is to permit without spending a dime speech, however to have open debate and condemn hateful speech. We’ve seen the choice play out: The Biden-Harris White Home pressured Huge Tech firms to censor Individuals due to their views on COVID-19. In 2019, Harris known as on then-Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to droop Trump’s account.
Individuals probably received’t have the liberty to make use of right pronouns if Harris wins election. The Biden-Harris administration desires to make it a civil rights violation if somebody makes use of scientifically correct pronouns opposite to a gender-confused individual’s preferences.
For Democrats, “reproductive freedom” is the liberty they most wish to defend. The verbal pressured marriage of “reproductive” and “freedom” is one other stretch. Attempt as they could, copy, together with through in-vitro fertilization, can’t be divorced from its many penalties — corresponding to producing youngsters. That’s simply science.
Within the presidential debate, Harris used the phrase “freedom” solely in reference to abortion. “I can be a president that may shield our basic rights and freedoms together with the appropriate of a lady to make choices about her personal physique and never have her authorities inform her what to do,” Harris stated (she’s nice with the federal government telling you what to do on a bunch of different points).
However the freedom to abort an unborn youngster will not be actual freedom. In a very free society, one individual can’t be free to take one other’s liberty. An unborn youngster will not be a part of a lady’s physique or her property — it’s a separate human being with its personal rights. In taking the lifetime of an unborn youngster, a lady is taking away probably the most primary of all rights.
Twisting the phrase additional, Harris says she desires to defend the “freedom to vote.” However that’s no extra true of Democrats than Republicans. Either side wish to enact election legal guidelines that favor their celebration. However Republicans wish to make our election system safer.
Actually, Democrats have taken their very own voters’ freedom this presidential election. It’s the Democratic Get together that ousted its incumbent, prevented an actual main problem, and has fought any impartial challenger. Nor have Democrats given Republicans the liberty to vote. Democrats, together with different lawfare, have pushed claims to kick Trump off the poll.
Harris says she’ll additionally defend “the liberty to like who you like overtly.” The truth is she’ll take dad and mom’ rights.
Her first marketing campaign video reveals crowds waving pleasure flags as Harris says “we select freedom.” However the LGBT neighborhood is much from closeted – pleasure parades usually characteristic half-naked adults in public in entrance of kids.
Conservatives need the liberty to guard their youngsters from ideologies which can be counter to their beliefs, together with sexually express books which can be inappropriate for kids. Democrats misleadingly name these efforts “e-book bans,” however by this logic, film scores are “film bans” as a result of younger youngsters aren’t alleged to see R-rated motion pictures.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
Girls received’t be free below a Harris administration. She received’t defend girls’s rights to maintain organic males out of their bogs, locker rooms, sports activities or sororities.
Harris would limit the Second Modification, but her marketing campaign casts gun management within the gentle of freedom: “As President, she received’t cease preventing in order that Individuals have the liberty to reside secure from gun violence in our colleges, communities, and locations of worship.”
Individuals probably received’t have the liberty to make use of right pronouns if Harris wins election. The Biden-Harris administration desires to make it a civil rights violation if somebody makes use of scientifically correct pronouns opposite to a gender-confused individual’s preferences.
Harris’s guarantees of freedom and pleasure (one other of her themes) sound as vacuous as former President Barack Obama’s marketing campaign of “hope and alter.” The Democrats wish to impose extra authorities management on Individuals, together with with costly and ineffective financial and environmental insurance policies.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Republicans additionally need clear air, however acknowledge that extra environmental regulation prices Individuals cash in greater power, housing and different prices. Being energy-independent prevents funding international authoritarian governments.
Sure, Democrats imagine within the “freedoms” of abortion, being LGBT, and voting with out ID — however they don’t imagine in First and Second Modification rights, a lady’s proper to not have males in female-only areas, dad and mom’ rights or power independence.