NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!
They’re nonetheless counting ballots in Pennsylvania and California – or, extra precisely, they’re nonetheless discovering ballots.
In Pennsylvania, three Democratic counties defy their liberal state Supreme Court docket by counting ineligible ballots. The pool of dangerous ballots isn’t sufficient to overturn the election for both President-elect Trump or Sen.-elect Dave McCormick, so why the push by the left to incorporate ineligible ballots?
The reason being easy and sinister: to set dangerous precedent for future elections.
Republican Sen.-elect Dave McCormick and Democratic Sen. Bob Casey (Getty Photos)
In California, the same effort is underway. There, a few U.S. Home elections stay to be determined. In California, a state with no efficient voter ID requirement, runs its elections virtually solely by mail. State legislation permits mail-in ballots with no postmark to be counted as much as every week after Election Day if the particular person finishing the poll affixes a date on or earlier than Election Day.
WHY THE MAGA MOVEMENT IS THE 1776 REVOLUTION OF OUR TIME
Thus, if there’s a shut race that requires “fortification” – the left’s 2020 euphemism for election theft – Democratic operatives want solely discover just a few voters who haven’t voted, “assist” them fill out a poll, and again date the signature – and voila! The late-breaking votes magically skew Democratic.
To the typical voter, about 85% of whom assist presenting an ID to vote, these mail-in poll manipulations are stunning. They degrade religion in our election processes.
That the Left pushes election law previous the breaking level is comprehensible on a pure will-to-power foundation. However for a lot of on the left, particularly the ideological vanguard that has pushed the Democratic Celebration to the far left, there’s one other, deeper and extra disturbing cause: they don’t view voting as a person job of a citizen appearing on their enlightened self-interest, quite, they see voting as a collective proper.
Voting as a Collective Proper
Democrats, notably their crucial race idea (CRT)-driven factions, view voting as a collective proper quite than a person one. This ideology prioritizes group identification over particular person company, arguing that elections should ship racially and socially “simply” outcomes, no matter procedural equity.
MORNING GLORY: TOP 10 LESSONS FROM THE LANDSLIDE
This view aligns disturbingly with the idea of concurrent majority espoused by John C. Calhoun, the early Nineteenth-century political theorist who served as a congressman, senator and vice chairman beneath John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson. The bitter historic irony right here is that Calhoun was an ardent supporter of slavery. He would heartily agree with the concept of race figuring out political outcomes.
John C. Calhoun, the early Nineteenth-century political theorist who served as a congressman, senator and vice chairman beneath John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson.
A stark instance is California’s ballot trafficking system, which permits paid operatives to stress voters at their properties, destroying the secrecy and sanctity of the poll. This method, institutionalized over the previous decade, has yielded dramatic good points for Democrats, with union-aligned operatives making certain ballots are “accomplished appropriately.”
This was introduced house to me every week earlier than the election after I participated in a discussion board on voting rights at an area faculty. My sparring accomplice was an officer with the League of Ladies Voters. Simply after declaring the sanctity of the key poll, she described, and not using a trace of irony, serving to senior residents in nursing properties vote by mail. The concept all these ballots have been accomplished in secret by voters who’ve misplaced their psychological acuity strains credulity.
NANCY PELOSI IS FINISHED — NO ONE DESERVES MORE BLAME FOR DEMS’ $1B ELECTORAL COLLAPSE
However the CRT lens justifies such measures, framing elections not as impartial mechanisms of alternative however as instruments to rectify historic wrongs and redistribute energy.
Destroying Election Safeguards
The left’s assault on election safeguards predates COVID-19 however gained momentum through the pandemic. Emergency guidelines, initially billed as momentary, have hardened into fixtures of the electoral panorama. Pennsylvania’s and California’s present ballot-handling controversies are emblematic of this shift.
In Pennsylvania, the deliberate counting of ineligible ballots, regardless of courtroom rulings, exemplifies contempt for the rule of legislation. California’s lax requirements for mail-in ballots – mixed with partisan Postal Service unions – invite abuse. These practices are much less about counting each vote than about creating programs weak to manipulation.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
What’s at Stake
Election integrity measures, corresponding to requiring voter ID and limiting poll trafficking, are derided as voter suppression by CRT adherents. Nevertheless, these measures intention to protect the person’s free and secret vote—a core pillar of democracy.
The battle will not be between partisans however between these defending democracy’s rules and people in search of to redefine them.
Left unchecked, these developments danger eroding public confidence in elections. States like Florida and Texas, which have resisted California-style programs, present a counterpoint, however the pattern is obvious: Until systemic safeguards are bolstered, elections will more and more be decided by paid operatives or left-wing activists, not voters.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Because the 2024 elections demonstrate, the stakes are increased than ever. The Left’s collectivist voting philosophy justifies election manipulation beneath the guise of social justice, jeopardizing the integrity of democratic processes.
To safeguard our republic, People should confront these harmful traits and demand reforms that prioritize the person’s proper to a free, honest and secret poll.
