U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) speaks to the media throughout a go to to El Salvador to advocate for the discharge of Kilmar Abrego Garcia in San Salvador, El Salvador, April 16, 2025.
Jose Cabezas | Reuters
Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen stated Sunday that his journey to El Salvador to satisfy with Kilmar Abrego Garcia was about “defending the rights of this man to due course of,” and never about “defending the person.”
“The Trump administration has admitted in court docket that he was wrongfully detained and wrongfully deported,” the Maryland senator stated on ABC Information’ “This Week.”
“My mission and my function is to be sure that we uphold the rule of legislation, as a result of if we take it away from him, we do jeopardize it for everyone else,” he added.
Van Hollen additionally warned on CNN’s “State of the Union,” that denying “the constitutional rights of this one man, … threatens the constitutional rights of everyone in America.”
On NBC’s “Meet the Press,” the senator stated the Trump administration is “flouting the courts as we communicate.”
When requested whether or not the U.S. is in a constitutional disaster, the Maryland senator stated: “Sure, we’re.”
Van Hollen’s Sunday present media blitz comes after he traveled to El Salvador this week to satisfy with Abrego Garcia, who was mistakenly deported from Maryland.
In recounting his assembly with Abrego Garcia, Van Hollen described him as having “skilled trauma” from his imprisonment.
“He informed me in regards to the trauma he had been experiencing, each by way of the kidnapping and the truth that he was initially despatched to CECOT, which is that this infamous jail,” Van Hollen stated on “This Week.”
Van Hollen’s go to to El Salvador got here after its President Nayib Bukele said during a White House go to earlier this month that he wouldn’t return Abrego Garcia to the U.S.
Hours later, the Trump administration informed a federal decide that it lacked authority to compel El Salvador to return Abrego Garcia, regardless of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling saying that the administration ought to “facilitate” his return.
