Article content material
$200 rebate will go a really good distance
Re: Letter, Doug Ford is just trying to buy our votes, Nov. 4.
Our cash is being given again to us. To these of you who assume $200 gained’t assist, you’re out of contact. You’re little doubt on some listed pension plan or incomes an above-average wage. You’re clearly fairly wholesome as effectively, as a result of our health-care system works.
Maybe we are able to maintain the shift-working nurses who maintain us. On the similar time maybe we might consolidate among the college board redundancies to assist with rising schooling bills.
Article content material
I can be voting Conservative within the subsequent election. Provincially and federally.
Gregor Doll, Cornwall
Conservatives ought to assist a value on carbon
As a lifelong Conservative with a background in economics, I’m bitterly upset within the management of the Conservative Occasion of Canada’s stance on a refundable carbon tax. It seemd to have succeeded in fully trashing the coverage thought within the public thoughts. That is an completely shameful failure of management as a result of Conservatives know higher. They perceive how a market economic system works and the way essential costs are.
Local weather change is hitting us tougher and quicker than I had ever anticipated it could in my lifetime. Excessive climate occasions have gotten commonplace. The prices of coping with local weather change are rising quickly.
Canadians as shoppers of vitality ought to do their half and ideally be leaders within the battle. Placing a value on carbon emissions is a perfect market-based technique to encourage people, companies, governments and different our bodies to make modifications that cut back carbon emissions. Making the tax refundable supplies a measure of monetary safety as a result of such changes take time and a few folks could have nice problem adjusting.
Article content material
I’ve solely a fuzzy notion of what the Conservative celebration’s coverage to fight local weather change can be. The celebration doesn’t speak about it a lot. I consider the coverage consists of promotion and assist for nuclear energy and the export of pure gasoline, which might each be very smart insurance policies. (The carbon emissions from gasoline are half that of coal, and coal nonetheless generates multiple quarter of energy consumption on the planet.)
It might additionally embody placing a value on carbon for giant emitters. In that case, why not for everybody?
Don Bennett, Stittsville
Advisable from Editorial
Share this text in your social community
