This week we’re overlaying the profitable matter from the most recent ACOUP Senate ballot, which is a take a look at a few of the odd designs and mechanics for futuristic science fiction physique armor, notably inflexible ‘hardsuits.’ Naturally, this publish isn’t going to cowl each number of armor that seems in science fiction, so I wish to be clear that I’m typically limiting my scope right here to inflexible non-powered armor. Energy (or powered) armor – that’s, armor that strikes with built-in servos and motors, reasonably than purely beneath muscle energy – is its personal matter that we’ll go away for one more day.
(I’m operating a bit behind on this one on account of the Thanksgiving Vacation, however I’m going to go forward and publish it, a bit rougher-cut than typical, and hopefully repair any typos or errors once I get again residence)
As a substitute, I wish to concentrate on inflexible science fiction armors as a result of they provide an fascinating lens to contemplate their design: the right way to armor a human physique in a inflexible substance is an exceedingly solved downside: fairly a number of cultures have tackled this explicit downside with loads of vitality and ingenuity, making an attempt to stability safety, mobility and weight. And the “downside with sci-fi physique armor” begins with the truth that most of those futuristic ‘hardsuits’ make the most of little of any of the design language of these efforts. As a substitute, the place actual armors evolve in opposition to threats, fictional armors evolve as a visible language, borrowing the design parts of different fictional armors much more usually than they dip into their very own historic exemplars, with the consequence that the entire thing kind of devours itself.
All of which gives an enchanting window to speak about how precise armor is designed and the issues that may encourage its construction, in distinction to the customarily very flawed visible designs we see in media.
So what we’re going to do is first take a look at some fairly clearly (to me, at the very least) flawed science fiction armor designs. Then we’ll take a look at how threats form protection and different issues for physique armor and from there take a look at some historic exemplars which may level to potential options (and in addition a bit why I think designers don’t use them).
As at all times, if you happen to like what you’re studying right here, please share it; if you happen to actually prefer it, you’ll be able to assist me onPatreon; members on the Patres et Matres Conscripti stage get to vote on the matters for post-series like this one! If you’d like updates each time a brand new publish seems, you’ll be able to click on under for e mail updates or comply with me on twitter (@BretDevereaux) and Bluesky (@bretdevereaux.bsky.social) and (much less regularly) Mastodon(@bretdevereaux@historians.social) for updates when posts go reside and my basic musings; I’m within the technique of shifting over extra totally to Bluesky than Twitter, on condition that the previous has, of late, turn out to be a greater place for historic dialogue than the latter.
Getting Armor Unsuitable
What truly spurred this matter in my thoughts the primary time was a single promotional nonetheless for Dune (2021) displaying Dave Batista (as Glossu Rabban) together with some Harkonnen troopers of their battle armor, as a result of I assumed each the design of the armor and in addition particularly the modifications made to Batista’s ‘major character’ model of it had been actually telling:
Specifically, you’ll be able to see that the Harkonnen troopers (officers, presumably) have armor that consists of heavy pauldrons and a excessive collar, together with a breastplate that runs all the way in which to the hips (the ‘belt line’ as distinct from the pure waist) after which extends a bit additional within the entrance. However one additionally immediately notices that Batista’s armor is loads much less protecting: the inflexible element covers solely the upper-torso, with solely cloth over the stomach and far much less shoulder safety. And it isn’t notably exhausting to guess why: with such massive inflexible parts, one imagines these extras within the shot can’t transfer or bend very a lot (I believe you’ll be able to truly considerably see, within the shot above, how confined their posture is, in reality), however Batista must do loads of bodily appearing and emoting which goes to demand that he can increase his arms over his head and bend on the waist.
Besides, in fact, if these fellows had been anticipating to be in an precise combat they may additionally wish to, , be capable of increase their arms over their heads or bend on the waist!
That downside restricted to those Harkennonen uniforms, though the distinction between Rabban’s armor and everybody else makes it fairly clear. However you’ll be able to see the identical situation and the way it was resolved – from a movie perspective – on the Atreides and Sardaukar armor. The Atreides armor is worn for the arrival scene, so it may be fairly inflexible as a result of nobody must truly combat in it. Consequently, the inflexible shaping of the breastplate, which extends all the way in which over the pelvis appears, within the scene, to require the actors to remain fairly rigidly stiff and arise very straight, whereas its not clear the pauldrons permit a full vary of motions to the arms.
In the meantime the Sardaukar do must take their armor into precise combat scenes. And the movie’s answer was to cheat: the Sardaukar armor appears to be like inflexible, with the identical closely structured pauldrons as the opposite too and the lengthy entrance ‘plate’ operating all the way down to the waist, however in reality if you happen to look carefully (particularly as they transfer and combat) you understand these ‘armors’ aren’t inflexible in any respect, however look like product of versatile textile, permitting the actors to bend and transfer. What I believe is fascinating is that the Sardaukar armor, to my eyes, shares a lot of the shaping and design language of the Atreides and Harkonnen armor, I believe we’re supposed to imagine they’re all product of the identical inflexible parts in solely modestly completely different kinds. in fairly a number of methods: as a penetrating blow with all the power directed at a small level (spears, sword-thrusts) or a reducing blow with the power concentrated alongside a slender edge (swords, axes) or blunt trauma, delivering doubtlessly considerably extra vitality considerably much less concentrated.
These menace profiles affect supplies and design. Armor works largely by changing varied sorts of piercing or slashing assaults into blunt trauma distributed over the widest attainable a part of the physique. And that in flip is a part of the benefit of utilizing inflexible supplies in armor building. In fact the supplies themselves additionally play a task: inflexible supplies (like metal) are sometimes loads stronger for his or her weight or thickness than non-rigid options (like cloth). But additionally in loads of instances rigidity is the purpose (or extra accurately, the way you defeat some extent). If an armor materials completely holds collectively however bends such that it’s merely pushed into the wound, that isn’t essentially a super end result (the traditional instance of this are silk Steppe clothes which could not be pierced by an arrow, as a result of silk fibers could be very robust, but in addition wouldn’t actually impede the arrow, being as a substitute simply pushed in across the arrowhead).
A inflexible materials can unfold out the vitality of a weapon influence over a big floor; as a result of assuming it stays inflexible your entire armor element strikes from the influence, contacting the physique throughout a a lot bigger space. The ability of distributing influence vitality on this method is fairly stark. A 50J influence concentrated into a really small, sharp influence zone (just like the tip of a spear or an arrowhead) can simply produce deadly wounds. Against this 200J utilized throughout your whole chest is one thing you’ll actually discover, however in all probability gained’t trigger any everlasting damage. Certainly, as trendy physique armors present, impacts upwards of two-thousand joules (the vitality supply of many trendy rifle rounds) is kind of survivable if unfold over sufficient of the physique. So inflexible parts (be {that a} breastplate or, as in trendy armor, one thing like inflexible plate inserts) could be of great worth exactly as a result of they’re inflexible and thus unfold out the vitality of influence.
That mentioned, you’ll not armor all elements of the physique evenly. We’ve actually discussed this before, back in some of the earliest days of ACOUP: armor is at all times a stability between weight and safety, with the consequence that armor isn’t uniform in construction or thickness. Thicker armor means extra weight, which provides up pretty quickly, whereas extra full safety round joints means reductions in mobility. So an armorer has to assume fairly exhausting in regards to the tradeoffs between mobility, weight and safety. And one of many key questions right here is, fairly merely, “the place is an opposing blow most probably to land or be most harmful?”
The reply to this query relies on an intersection of two elements. On the one hand, there’s the attacker’s issue: biomechanically, all weapon-strikes originate from the shoulders and in order they journey away from the shoulders, they sacrifice attain and energy to take action. If I’ve, say, a sword and wish to strike at your legs, I’ve to advance additional into measure to have the ability to achieve this, as a result of my arms and weapon are angled downward from my shoulders, whereas you’ll be able to reply by making a ‘straight line’ strike at my upper-body. Consequently, with contact weapons, there’s loads of menace on the higher physique, much less on the legs. Specifically loads of weapons can ship very robust downward strikes onto the shoulders themselves, so the prime of the shoulders is a fairly necessary menace zone. The upper-arms, against this, demand a horizontal strike, reasonably than a falling vertical strike: that’s a vulnerability, however much less so.
The opposite issue derives from the defender’s physique: completely different elements of the physique are in a different way deadly if struck. Strikes to the shoulders, neck or head are clearly doubtlessly very quickly deadly, although the top each requires much more mobility and in addition is tougher to strike successfully as a result of heads have a tendency to maneuver round loads in touch preventing. Likewise, the torso is stuffed with important organs and arteries that make wounds there actually harmful; the upper-torso is probably simpler for an enemy to strike, however the presence of the rib-cage (nature’s pure armor) can each restrict the harm a weapon strike there causes and in addition, within the case of a stab, make it exhausting to recuperate the weapon (that’s, get it again out). Consequently, loads of preventing techniques emphasize penetrating strikes to the intestine. Against this, legs and arms transfer round loads and are typically much less deadly if struck.
That results in the tough ‘order in armor’ I mentioned all these years in the past, with the chest and head (particularly the skull, the highest of the top) coming first, adopted by the shoulders, adopted by the waist/hips and higher thigh, adopted by limb and face safety.
Against this, the menace profile of gunpowder warfare is barely however importantly completely different. On the one hand it’s a lot tougher to armor in opposition to bullets as a result of they arrive with far more vitality. And I wish to stress: far more vitality. For a sword or spear swung by human arms, the higher limits are round 130J, although most blows can be a lot weaker than this. Arrows, as we’ve noted, prime out across the similar vitality at launch however fall off considerably in flight. Against this, musket bullets can arrive with many tons of of joules of vitality and trendy rifle rounds can ship within the neighborhood of two,000J of vitality on influence. So armor that’s making an attempt to cease such a spherical has to have the ability to take in a lot extra vitality and efficiently unfold it out over extra of the defender’s floor.
The opposite issue is that, whereas melee strikes originate on the shoulders however could be rising strikes (‘uppercuts’) or falling strikes or horizontal strikes, bullets and different direct-fire weapons (this is able to be, as an example, equally true of directed vitality weapons) fly very quick on comparatively flat trajectories, which suggests the menace is usually to the entrance of the physique. In the meantime, whereas a melee combatant can tailor his strikes to your armor – placing on the unarmored parts of your armor – troopers with weapons are typically educated to purpose for the middle of mass and customarily can not, in battlefield circumstances, goal particular elements of the physique of an enemy (on account of limits of accuracy and vary). Consequently, whereas armor in opposition to contact weapons tends to need pretty full protection of the torso (together with the perimeters and the tops of the shoulders), armor in opposition to bullets (and different missile weapons) is far more involved with overlaying the vertical surfaces of the torso and is prepared to compromise armor on the shoulders and even go away gaps in safety, if which means attaining a positive stability of protection and weight.
Should you look again as much as the Mass Impact armors, I believe you will note the place they take a few of their design language right here with the shoulders lined solely by the straps holding up the breastplate (with the pauldrons moved over to the higher armors; we’ll get to that), which you see in trendy physique armor designed for bullets. One additionally sees that sample – a breastplate basically suspended over the chest by straps over the shoulders, reasonably than extending some protecting protection over the shoulders – in some Japanese armors (notably these related to non-elite troopers, the ashigaru), which I think has loads to do with the prevalence of arrows in Japanese warfare within the pre-Tokugawa interval. Extra elaborate armor for the samurai warrior-class regularly options sode, protections for the shoulders and upper-arms.
Structuring Inflexible Armors
As soon as we’ve selected what must be armored and that the how is a inflexible materials, be that metal, ceramic ballistic plates, or some future materials, we then have to consider how the armor goes to articulate, that’s, the way it will permit motion. In any case, the human physique isn’t inflexible and has to bend in sure methods to allow us to maneuver and combat.
And certainly, right here the calls for of preventing with contact weapons impose some fairly sharp limits on armor, as a result of successfully preventing with swords or spears or different contact weapons typically requires utilizing the entire physique: you want to have the ability to twist and bend on the waist, transfer the arms freely (together with getting them over your head), handle footwork and so forth. In consequence, armorers wanted to be fairly cautious in how they constructed armor safety in order to not restrict mobility (which is, I have to observe, a separate query from weight and its influence on fatigue and endurance).
“Additionally let me inform you that the scholar instantly earlier than me who struck his opponent within the face with the pommel of his sword, may even have completed what I do, that’s, step together with his proper foot behind his opponent’s left leg, after which hook his opponent’s neck together with his sword deal with, in an effort to throw him to the bottom as I do.” (trans. Colin Hatcher)
The primary answer to the issue of the right way to use a inflexible materials to armor the physique is in fact to easily armor the elements of the physique that don’t bend after which use another materials to guard the elements that do. Archaic Greek ‘bell’ cuirasses and later Greek and Roman muscle cuirasses take this method, with the cuirass terminating on the hips and hanging leather-based strips, referred to as pteryges, hanging all the way down to cowl the remainder of the hips, groin and higher legs. However this isn’t precisely a super answer, because it sacrifices loads of protection.
As a substitute, in fact, the answer is to assemble the armor out of a collection of inflexible plates that are capable of transfer relative to one another. There may be one other answer, which is to create what is basically a cloth composed of inflexible rings – mail – however we’re going to go away that apart for at this time. The earliest of those articulation options is scale armor, by which we imply an armor composed of loads of small inflexible scales (steel or hardened leather-based, sometimes) that are mounted to backing materials (textile or leather-based), in order that they dangle down. The scales overlap, which presents a stable steel face to the enemy, however since they transfer independently, little mobility is misplaced, permitting a scale coat to increase down previous the waist and even cowl the legs. The weak spot of the method, nonetheless, is that the scales are solely anchored to the backing materials on the prime; there’s not a lot to cease a blade or spear-tip from sliding up one scale and beneath one other, thus penetrating the armor. That’s much less of a priority for one thing like an arrow-strike (which goes to be descending at the very least considerably when it arrives) however in opposition to an opponent with a sword or dagger in shut fight, that could be a very actual weak spot.
A technique to clear up that weak spot is to attach the scales to one another reasonably than to the backing, in order that an opponent can not slide a weapon beneath them or flip up a scale to render the opponent susceptible. That answer – small steel plates related to one another, reasonably than a backing – we name lamellar armor and it was quite common in a variety of cultures, but it surely has little or no buy in trendy fantasy or science fiction armor designs, I believe primarily as a result of it was not included within the Dungeons and Dragons armor system. Nonetheless, lamellar armor was fairly widespread in a variety of cultures: we see it within the Close to East, in Europe, in China and in Japan. The rigidity of the general armor for lamellar varies based mostly on how the plates are related collectively (which you’ll be able to see fairly clearly in Japanese armor, wherein a single set of armor usually contains each inflexible surfaces and articulation each utilizing lamellar, related kind of rigidly). In Europe, we see a variation on this idea, the brigandine (additionally underused in fantasy settings) the place the steel plates are riveted via one another and a textile or leather-based backing.
However in fact the answer we’re most concerned about is plate armor, the place a set of armor (a ‘harness’) consists of a set of articulating plates which each present a inflexible safety to the wearer but in addition articulate the place the wearer wants them to bend. Now going via all the completely different strategies late medieval plate armor makes use of to permit the armor to articulate would run past the scope of this publish, however the related half right here is the way in which that plate armor articulates over the torso, broadly talking. The important thing elements listed below are the cuirass, composed of a breastplate and a backplate, which covers the upper-half of the torso; this element is mostly totally inflexible over that floor as a result of the human physique doesn’t bend there a lot both (on account of the rib-cage).
Beneath the cuirass, usually instantly hooked up to it, is a element referred to as faulds. This consists of a set of articulating ‘lames’ (horizontal strips of armor) related through leather-based straps or typically sliding rivets in order that the lames can telescope into one another to allow the person to bend on the waist or increase their legs and even sit down. Faulds often prolong over the hips (typically solely on the entrance) and a little bit of the higher legs however often run down so far as the knees. Then in lots of armors, an extra pair of steel plates dangle down from the faulds to cowl the higher legs referred to as tassets.
Above the cuirass, we’ve got pauldrons or spaulders (we needn’t right here get into the variations), which shield the shoulders and higher arms. These are structured with a shoulder ‘cop’ – a dome-shaped steel piece – overlaying the shoulders, to which had been hooked up a collection of descending lames (articulated the identical method the faulds can be) to use protection to the higher arms. Crucially, these items typically connect to the cuirass (although spaulders usually additionally connect to the upper-arm armor referred to as the rerebrace) reasonably than simply to the higher arms, as a result of as you’ll recall defending the highest of the shoulder is admittedly fairly necessary. Certainly, even an informal look via historic and medieval armor will rapidly reveal that this armor tends to be the thickest on the shoulder: Early mail armor usually featured a second later of mail to cowl the shoulders, as an example; for some medieval armor, a mail coif or aventail additionally offered a layer of safety over the mail overlaying the shoulder.
The important thing benefit of this setup is that by terminating the stable type of the cuirass on the ‘pure waist’ (the place the physique is thinnest) the cuirass permits the wearer to bend and rotate on the waist, whereas the faulds, with their telescoping design, permit the wearer to bend down on the waist, increase their legs or sit. Likewise, the segmented, articulated building of the pauldron each protects the shoulder, but in addition permits the arms to be raised.
Returning to Speculative Armors
Coming again then to our science fiction armors, we will diagnose a few of the issues right here. Each the Mass Impact and Dune armors prolong too far down the physique in a single, inflexible construction which might price the wearer some means to bend. Within the case of the Mass Impact armor, there’s some trace of articulation, however within the video games’ precise animation the armor doesn’t articulate, however reasonably merely bends, regardless of being apparently inflexible in construction (just like the breastplate to which it attaches). As well as, the Dune armor options massive pauldrons which seem like they provide loads of safety, but it surely’s not clear how properly they will fold upwards to permit the arms to be raised; within the case of the Sardaukar armor, it actually appears to be like like they will solely as a result of the fabric they’re made out of isn’t, in reality, inflexible.
The alternate type of these issues one more and more sees, notably in fantasy armor, is to easily not cowl a few of these areas of difficulty. Thus as an example, Baldur’s Gate III‘s armors have this downside the place there can be a breastplate, however no faulds or tassets, resulting in a query of the right way to fill all of that area under the waist. I had meant to incorporate a screenshot from the very latest Dragonage: Veilguard, which has this downside dangerous in some armors as properly, however I’m away from residence proper now and haven’t the photographs at hand. In that case, a number of armors find yourself wanting extra like a padded jumpsuit with only a small armored plate over the upper-chest.
Likewise, I’ve seen an inclination for pauldrons to finish up, reasonably than a dome over the shoulder with some articulation, as a vertical plate related to the upper-arm, which each compromises safety on the highest of the shoulder. That’s not an enormous downside, as we’ve seen, if the armor is designed to deal primarily with direct-fire missile weapons (like weapons), however a major downside whether it is designed to guard in opposition to swords (additionally a tall or spikey plate affixed to the upper-arm may doubtlessly dig into the neck once you raised your arms, which might be greater than a bit uncomfortable).
Now, we’d ask why do these costumes hold reproducing these kinds of ‘dangerous’ designs? I believe the very first thing to notice on that rating is that costume armors are sometimes extra in dialog with different costumes than with historic or trendy armor. In consequence, these designs usually don’t ‘reference again’ to the true factor in a method that will floor them within the realities of fight and even simply bodily mobility.
One other issue is supplies. Actual armor is mostly made of pricy, sturdy, inflexible supplies which can be designed to take a beating. For a lot of the iron age, that was, in fact, iron (or metal), together with padded textiles and hardened leathers. For contemporary armor, the essential construction is product of kevlar or different equally robust artificial materials, backed up by metal or ceramic insert plates. With these kinds of supplies, joints, rivets and different attachment factors could be actually sturdy whereas nonetheless being small. It simply doesn’t take a really massive rivet or buckle to carry as much as the forces of a shifting human physique when the rivet or buckle is product of metal.
Against this, my understanding is that loads of costume armors for TV and movie are product of weaker, lighter and cheaper supplies, like plastics, unhardened leather-based or EVA foam. These supplies usually need to be thicker than the equal in one thing like iron or metal merely to carry collectively (although they’re usually a lot lighter), but in addition they will’t deal with small, high-stress connection factors, just like the sliding rivets or buckles of articulated lames or the holes in scale or particularly lamellar. In consequence, its usually fairly exhausting to make these articulated buildings with these supplies. Not not possible, in fact – you will note gifted cosplay of us work miracles with leather-based and EVA foam – however tougher.
As an apart, I’ve usually suspected for this reason good ol’ trend mail – ubiquitous on the medieval battlefield throughout Eurasia – is so uncommon in fantasy movies and TV. In older motion pictures, it was widespread to make use of silver spray-paint on kitting to create ‘knitted mail’ and that works properly sufficient for extras within the background, however for main characters, there’s usually no actual substitute for precise mail which goes to want to truly be made of hundreds (tens of hundreds in the event that they’re accurately sized) steel rings. And you may’t actually make these out of plastic or foam if you’d like the costumes to carry up throughout taking pictures. Consequently, whereas one can actually get mail made a lot cheaper at this time than even 20 years in the past, there isn’t any actually ‘low-cost’ technique to get numerous mail, particularly if one insists on realistically small rings.
Now the humorous factor is that this materials downside shouldn’t apply to video video games in any respect. In any case, online game armors – any armor that exists solely in CGI – doesn’t need to trouble itself with the principles for this or that materials. Thus there’s nothing stopping CGI artists from making armor with articulation, scales and so forth. And typically they do. However usually, I believe, there’s the suggestions impact the place online game artists aren’t imitating actual world armors, they’re imitating movie armors, and so inheriting their issues even once they don’t share their limitations. That, I believe, explains numerous the silliness one sees in games like Baldur’s Gate III and DragonAge: Veilguard.
The ultimate issue, I believe, for science fiction armors is an aesthetic one: artists and designers engaged on science fiction properties don’t need an armor construction that feels medieval in its design. The telescoping design of faulds and the free-hanging plates of tassets, particularly, appear to scream ‘medieval’ of their visible content material, which could be seen as undesirable for a manufacturing – be it a online game or a movie – that wishes armor to feel and appear futuristic. The issue is that whereas supplies could change, the human physique doesn’t.
Coming again to Dune and Mass Impact, the quirk of each settings is that as a result of shields can considerably restrict the vulnreability to ranged weapons, however aren’t efficient in opposition to melee weapons, the armor worn is principally about coping with these melee weapons. That is express within the Dune universe, the place it’s, by the point the novels happen, not widespread for troopers to even repeatedly carry firearms and different ranged weapons. Once more, we must always get into, another time, if the Dune fight mannequin works, however I’d say beneath these circumstances we should count on armor to look quite a bit like medieval plate armor by way of protection and form. However in fact which may properly minimize in opposition to what the director or the artist desires to speak by way of futuristic shaping.
All of that mentioned, one of many issues that has modified is that for designers who wish to take into account their armor designs a bit extra deeply is that there’s a lot extra info accessible. Museum catalogs nowadays are typically on-line with photos and it’s a lot simpler to have interaction with the sturdy neighborhood of recreators and reenactors who are sometimes pretty educated not solely about how armor was made but in addition the way it was worn. So the chance for designs that have interaction meaningfully with previous armors in a method that produces one thing that each appears to be like good however is definitely broadly operate is far better now than it was even simply twenty or thirty years in the past.
