ECONOMYNEXT – A World Financial institution report on Sri Lanka’s tax has slammed worth added tax hike, although fee cuts and cash printing for potential output concentrating on by macro-economists led to a collapse of the rupee and inflation that was the core cause for a dramatic rise in poverty.
The rhetoric in opposition to VAT could have adverse penalties for Sri Lanka for which the poor will finally pay a better worth if it results in a repeat of tax cuts like in 2019, observers say.
The latest steep rise in Sri Lanka VAT was additionally a results of having to pay the salaries of a bloated public sector, together with 100,000 improvement officers and different unemployed graduates employed into public service, who apparently would not have workplaces to sit down and work in keeping with statements made in parliament in addition to a legacy giant navy from a civil battle.
Forex Collapse
Sri Lanka’s dramatic rise in poverty got here after a minimize in worth added tax which partly helped set off a foreign money disaster, as open market operations changed misplaced taxes, not a rise in VAT.
Sri Lanka additionally has draconian protectionist taxes on rice, maize and grains which are preserving meals costs up 50 p.c or increased than the area for the poor particularly.
The influence on cigarette and alcohol taxes should not identified, however many poorer households and never so poor have shifted to moonshine and beedi.
The World Financial institution report has advocated extra direct taxes (akin to revenue taxes) which critics say takes spending selections away from the folks and provides discretion to authorities officers and bureaucrats.
Sri Lanka’s hike in worth added tax has ” have contributed to rising prices for poorer households’, the report stated, repeating a story usually pushed by the political class and socialists in Sri Lanka.
The tax measures could have elevated poverty by 3.9 p.c between 2022 and mid 2023, the report stated.
“Furthermore, fiscal reforms led to rising dwelling prices and declining incomes,” the report stated.
“Particularly, eradicating electrical energy subsidies and shifting to cost-recovery utility pricing had a larger influence on poorer households, contributing to a 5 p.c lower in disposable revenue for households within the poorest decile, and a 1.9 share level improve in poverty.”
The rise in utility costs was required as a result of macroeconomists depreciated the foreign money after printing cash elevating price of manufacturing.
RELATED : Sri Lanka poverty has doubled to 25-pct in latest crisis: World Bank VP
In nations with foreign money instability, classical economics, primarily Hume’s worth specie circulate mechanism is rejected and foreign money defence is blamed.
Nonetheless foreign money defence is deflationary within the first occasion, and is normally offset by newly printed cash by macro-economists to keep up a coverage fee, resulting in extra credit score and reserve losses.
Sri Lanka additionally has a 5 p.c inflation goal which was devised by macroeconomists to push up the price of dwelling of the poor every year which is able to scale back disposable incomes except salaries go up sooner. Amid deflationary coverage the 5 p.c inflation goal was not met.
The compounding impact of a 5 p.c inflation goal on the poor shouldn’t be identified.
In Sri Lanka ‘aggressive trade charges’, additionally pushed by macroeconomists, has triggered industrial strife and social unrest for many years.
Socialist Taxes
The World Financial institution report talked about the gini coefficient, nevertheless analysts say advocating taxes not for income however Western socialist ideology of flattening folks’s incomes by re-distribution and authorities spending has had dangerous repercussions prior to now.
Sri Lanka has ‘taxed the wealthy’ for many years since independence below extra socialist administrations with the near the doctrine advocated by the World Financial institution and Worldwide Financial Fund lately together with housing taxes, however obtained nowhere whereas East Asian nations that did the alternative with decrease tax charges together with VAT and financial stability have gotten forward.
Shantayanan Devaranjan, now a professor at Georgetown College, who was a senior World Financial institution economist for a few years and has large expertise in creating nations, has stated there’s scant proof to assist that VAT is usually regressive.
“However the reality of the matter is that should you have a look at the way in which most VATs are administered, initially they have a tendency to have exemption on some primary gadgets that the poor eat, akin to meals,” defined Devaranjan in an interview with EconomyNext in 2023.
“So the poor are paying much less VAT due to the character of the products that they eat, than the wealthy.
“I’ve executed research, in Thailand, Philippines and Indonesia, and a number of other different folks have executed research all around the world, the place we have a look at the impact of the VAT.
“We have a look at the web impact of the tax, we take into consideration the truth that sure items are exempt, and what individuals are paying on web phrases and what we discover is that VAT is reasonably progressive or impartial.”
RELATED : Sri Lanka benefits from VAT, no evidence to support regressive claims
The World Financial institution report gave an evaluation saying VAT fashioned a decrease share of upper revenue teams, although and there was no readability whether or not the full VAT they paid was increased in quantity.
There was additionally no readability whether or not the decrease incidence (share share) of taxes of upper revenue teams was because of financial savings, which reduces the consumed a part of revenue and subsequently VAT the place the bottom is consumption.
Financial savings or foregone consumption is the premise of funding, which brings jobs and lasting reductions in poverty.
VAT can be superior to revenue tax in one other manner in that it generates extra income than revenue tax.
“That is true world wide,” Devaranjan says. “In most nations revenue ranges about 1 or 2 p.c of GDP together with in Sri Lanka.
“Whereas VAT can elevate 6, 7, 8 p.c of income. Merely as a software for income, the VAT is subsequently an environment friendly software.”
An individual who buys a automobile in Sri Lanka for instance pays extra taxes in a single transaction than a poorer particular person could spend in a few years.
Nonetheless there’s a socialist-ideological perception that increased revenue earners ought to pay an more and more increased share of taxes for the state and bureaucrats earlier than an financial determination to spend is made by the earner.
Earnings tax for instance is charged earlier than an financial determination is made by individuals who earn the cash not like VAT which is charged after financial freedom is exercised to spice up financial exercise.
East Asian nations have financial stability and have eschewed aggressive trade charges for decrease inflation, have decrease charges of tax general, together with company revenue tax of round 20 p.c and VAT round 14 p.c, analysts have identified.
“East Asia is closely into VAT,” Devaranjan additionally defined on the time. “They rely far more on VAT than revenue tax. Europe is usually VAT. The US is the one exception. The US has a really elaborate revenue tax construction that catches numerous tax evaders. Sri Lanka can’t afford that form of equipment.”
Not like revenue tax – company revenue tax particularly – which may have large swings within the credit score cycles perpetuated by fee cuts and inflationary coverage, VAT brings regular revenues to satisfy state expenditure.
The World report made no point out of import taxes which retains meals costs excessive and doesn’t give any taxes to the federal government however diverts potential taxes to the producers and collector oligopolies by arbitrage.
A reference was made to ‘oblique taxes’ which presumably consists of import duties.
Meals Taxes
Within the first half of 2025, Sri Lanka earned 77 billion rupees from a particular commodity levy which is charged on most meals. The SCL was initially began by then Finance Minister Bandula Gunawardene within the run as much as the Fed’s housing bubble to cease numerous import duties from cascading as commodity costs shot up.
In Sri Lanka rice is taxed at 65 rupees kilogram or 65,000 rupees a tonne which is about 215 {dollars} a tonne at an trade fee of 202 rupees per US greenback.
In line with the FAO, in August Indian 5 p.c damaged rice was quoted at 377 {dollars} a tonne, Pakistan 5 p.c damaged 361 {dollars}, Indian 5 p.c parboiled 368 {dollars} and Thai parboiled one hundred pc 392 {dollars}.
In Sri Lanka Nadu rice (a parboiled rice) is wholesaled round 200 rupees kilogram or round 662 {dollars} amid the taxes and an import ban which is a distinction of round 300 {dollars} a tonne.
Even when solely SCL of 65,000 rupees a tonne is taken into account, the ‘tax’ which Adam Smith referred to as an ‘absurd tax’ that’s paid by the folks for primary rice quantities to round 300 billion rupees, for final yr’s home rice manufacturing of 4.63 million kilograms.
He identified that import controls would scale back competitors and “by elevating their earnings above what they naturally can be, to levy, for their very own profit, an absurd tax upon the remainder of their fellow-citizens.”
Company Tax
The report advocated a minimal company tax fee of 15 p.c. Apart from corporations that get tax holidays, Sri Lanka’s company tax charges are round 30 p.c.
Sri Lanka engages in advert hoc tax hikes below IMF applications every time inflationary coverage triggers foreign money crises.
Within the first foreign money disaster triggered by the central financial institution round 1953, (a part of the inflation got here from the US cash printing to purchase Liberty Bonds) which was mounted with out an precise IMF program, Sri Lanka steeply raised taxes together with company taxes.
The central financial institution then advocated tax incentives.
“Prior to now, Authorities has needed to elevate taxes primarily with the thing of securing extra revenues,” the central financial institution report for 1953 stated when the present ideology on revenue distribution was not prevalent.
“The view is now broadly held that the current tax charges on private and company incomes are so excessive as to discourage enterprise. If these excessive charges are maintained, it will likely be fascinating to grant appropriate tax reliefs on accepted funding expenditures as an incentive to enterprise.”
A spread of import duties have been additionally raised, some as a surcharge which have been then absorbed into new tax charges, the 1953 report stated.
Not like now nevertheless, the central financial institution report additionally urged reducing spending. (Colombo/Sept 12/2025)
