The goal of the venture is to research the connection between the poetical and the philosophical within the Platonic dialogues. The venture thus operates alongside the intersection between literature and philosophy, two venerable fields throughout the humanities. This intersection has proven extensively completely different configurations all through historical past, the 2 matters having each rejected one another and interpenetrated one another in advanced methods. It’s exceptional, nevertheless, how strongly these two actions, rejection and interpenetration, concurrently present up within the Platonic dialogues, the place philosophy as a totally fledged style emerges. It’s as if Plato, in the mean time when he forcefully demonstrates the deserves of the brand new self-discipline, philosophy, raises questions on its independence, its boundaries, and about the best way to deal with and exploit different varieties of discourses, which we right here consult with in abstract kind as poetry or literature, and which Plato himself appears to welcome however on the identical time additionally to view with appreciable suspicion.
The venture will examine the interconnections between philosophy and the poetic within the Platonic corpus, and the form of unified philosophical discourse that outcomes – if this certainly is the case. The venture is a part of an effort to recruit and educate researchers and college students, and likewise to facilitate cooperation and mutual change and affect between researchers inside philosophy, literature and classics. The goal of this wider effort is to broaden the scope of Platonic research in Norway generally and to strengthen the collaboration between the Norwegian and worldwide Platonic scholarship. The venture has its nucleus within the analysis group “Historical philosophy” on the Division of Philosophy on the College of Bergen.
The venture as an entire will examine the Platonic conception of philosophy as a separate style, in opposition to and in cooperation with different historical literary genres, akin to epic and lyric poetry, tragedy and comedy, and historiography, taking the Platonic corpus as the purpose of departure. The venture will examine alternative ways of decoding the very kind that Plato perfected for the conduct of philosophy: the philosophical dialogue. The dialogue kind, thought of as a mimetic dramatization and staging of residing speech put into the mouths of the dialogue-characters, bears clear similarities to the genres of tragedy and comedy. Additionally, the truth that the dialogue kind that Plato makes use of is narrative in nature, can be a central concern. Why does Plato examine common philosophical issues in a approach that appears to take its departure from what occurs in particular discursive conditions? The Platonic dialogues exhibit an abundance of different literary components, akin to metaphorical imagery, myths, allegories and analogies. These components will not be used by chance or just for decorative causes. Quite the opposite, we assume that they’re chosen with nice care and subsequently have to be taken under consideration in any critical interpretation of the corpus. Furthermore, numerous varieties of tales or “myths” typically seem as arguments, or as an alternative choice to arguments, at crucial moments in numerous dialogues: to explain the destiny of the soul after dying within the Phaedo, the development of the cosmos within the Timaeus, the fervour of the lovers within the Phaedrus, and so forth. By way of his myths Plato should goal to specific one thing that he can’t specific via (logical) arguments. On the one hand, the myths – and different poetical components – should one way or the other mirror the demand for fact, however alternatively, these poetical components will not be simply harmonized with passages of a extra simple expository model. The intensive use of poetical components renders an idea of philosophy which is advanced and doubtlessly ambiguous. This venture will pose the query whether or not the anomaly is actual, or moderately based mostly on a false understanding of Plato’s philosophy as a purely argumentative style. Plato’s “invention” and building of a brand new style might, as a substitute, consist in his delicate interweaving of poetical and argumentative components in his philosophical quest. The venture goals at analyzing the roles performed by each the poetical and argumentative components within the philosophical quest for fact.
Nevertheless, the 2 features, the argumentative and the poetic, when seen remoted and by themselves, might not show to be of a simple and well-known nature. A lot of the essential argumentation within the dialogues centres round two approaches, the elenchus (refutation) and the techne (“artwork” or “craft”)- analogy. By way of the elenchus Plato questions the data, not solely of individuals – rhetoricians, sophists, poets and politicians – however, via them, of the established cultural custom as an entire. This transfer, nevertheless, presents us with an ambiguity. Though the standard data is discovered to have critical shortcomings, Plato makes use of this information as the purpose of departure; it’s thus each a limitation and a useful resource from which arguments are constructed. Plato appears to place a firmer belief within the data that the artisans possess. The techne-analogy, subsequently, is explored as a potential means to establishing philosophy as episteme. Nevertheless, it seems that the analogy has a restricted scope, because the artisans´ data can’t absolutely deal with the normative questions that Socrates, particularly, investigates. Each the elenchus and the techne-analogy, subsequently, appear to make use of in addition to to query completely different potential cognitive assets.
All through historical past some commentators have centered solely on the literary and rhetorical options of the dialogues, whereas others have tended to focus on their extra formally argumentative components. However there are additionally some precedents—each historical and fashionable— for combining these pursuits right into a single, built-in studying of the dialogues. For instance, one historical model of the method preserved in writings of Neo-Platonic commentators was revived throughout the early a part of the twentieth century by the classical philologist and Platonic scholar Paul Friedländer. This method gained appreciable momentum in sure philosophical circles throughout the second half of the century, in order that by now poetical and dramatic components are sometimes interpreted as an integral a part of Plato’s philosophy itself. Such literary-philosophical approaches fall into a number of distinguishable varieties.
The earliest are traceable to German philosophical influences within the phenomenology and existentialism of Martin Heidegger, and – much less clearly however importantly – Friedrich Nietzsche’s method to classics. These approaches embrace the hermeneutical therapy of Hans Georg Gadamer and the political-philosophical studying of Leo Strauss. These students at the moment are represented by quite a few second- and third-generation college students who pursue comparable approaches in studying Plato’s dialogues.
Within the wake of the just-mentioned efforts, additionally the analytical custom of Platonic interpretation has successfully taken up the query of the relation between the argumentative and poetic in Plato’s philosophy. See, as an illustration, Annas and Rowe (2002) and likewise Rowe (2007). All in all we discover in Plato research a merging of traditions that previously bore both an analytic or a continental stamp. This turns into evident once we think about the growing curiosity within the connections between Plato’s poetic and literary model and his philosophical thought taken in latest books and articles throughout a number of traditions and languages. These embrace book-length works in English by Charles Kahn (1998), Ruby Blondell (2002), A. Michilini (2003), Zückert (2009), and Lampert (2010); and Italian creator Fabio Giuliano’s 2005 guide. It’s not apparent, nevertheless, that the poetic and the philosophical have discovered its applicable stability in Platonic scholarship. In a assessment of three of the latest books in English addressing problems with kind and magnificence within the interpretation of the Platonic dialogue, Tania Gergel means that there has maybe arisen “a brand new ‘literary’ orthodoxy inside Platonic interpretation”. She provides, “Nevertheless, now that that is the case, it could be time to transcend the underlying notion of two various colleges of interpretation and start to synthesize these various approaches…in order to ‘transfer additional in direction of readings of Plato which respect the formal options of the dialogues, but additionally their philosophical complexity’.”[1] Our venture goals to reply to this problem.
Problematics and Working Hypotheses
The venture will examine the next problematics:
(a) The advanced determine of the thinker constructed within the dialogues.Our speculation right here is that Plato is establishing a brand new sort of scholar. This new sort, nevertheless, is offered in ways in which appear to contradict one one another and is, furthermore, not sharply distinguished from different varieties of clever males. However the determine of the thinker does appear to be clearly distinguished from ladies and thus appears to confront us with the necessity of a basic dialogue concerning the sexual character of this explicit determine.
(b) Plato’s philosophical arguments. We are going to examine the character of argumentation in relation to the literary components within the Platonic dialogues. Our speculation is that not solely is Platonic philosophy a mix of the 2, but additionally that we have to analyze them in distinction to one another with a view to perceive the character of each as they perform within the Platonic corpus.
(c) Plato’s dialogues and imitative poetry. We are going to examine the advanced relation between Plato’s dialogical dramas and imitative literature. Our speculation is that Plato´s dialogues, each in kind and content material, not solely come up from, but additionally oppose conventional literature, akin to Homer and dramatic poetry (tragedies and comedies).
The venture’s three central paths of investigation clearly overlap thematically. They may very well be pursued individually or collectively. Right here, we talk about them in additional element.
(a) The determine of the thinker
Within the Platonic corpus we discover the primary introduction to the determine of the thinker. This determine in fact most frequently assumes the persona of Socrates, however at different
instances he seems underneath different names – and even as an un-named foreigner.
Socrates, as the primary determine of the thinker, is offered in moderately ambiguous methods. His function because the grasp of elenchus – in Lysis, Charmides, Laches, Ion, Alcibiades I, Protagoras, Euthyphro, Lesser Hippias – appears to be fairly completely different from his conceptual interweaving of ethical and political summary theories within the Republic, the Phaedo and the Statesman. The distinction between the Socrates who professes his lack of information within the Apology from the theorizing cosmologist within the Timaeus can be putting. Furthermore, there’s a lower than clear distinction between the thinker and different educated or clever figures which might be displayed in several dialogues: the closeness between the thinker/stranger and the sophist within the Sophist;between the thinker/stranger and a statesman who appears to own technê-like experience within the Statesman; between Socrates and his “lecturers”, the rhetorician Aspasia within the Menexenus and the clever girl Diotima within the Symposium. These examples signifies that not solely does philosophy appear to develop into blurred on the edges, but additionally that its core is troublesome to pinpoint.
A number of interlocking questions spring from this. Is it Plato’s intention to indicate that philosophy embody all these components (and probably extra)? Or is his level that philosophy can and should embrace components that aren’t in themselves philosophical when the character of the investigation at hand calls for it? If that’s the case, does that imply that philosophy has its limitations? Or is he displaying that his insistence that philosophy is a brand new and distinctive self-discipline doesn’t suggest that its nature and extent is given as soon as and for all, however should be made an object for fixed reflection? If so, Plato’s corpus provides us ample materials for such a deliberation.
Metaphors and analogies join completely different themes, genres and varieties of data. An instance of this we discover within the Symposion, the place the thinker, because the lover of knowledge, is contrasted with the sophos, or moderately the sophê. This opposition takes the type of a sexual opposition between Socrates, the male thinker, and Diotima, the clever girl. On this dialogue, sexual metaphors in addition to metaphors of beginning are put into play within the try of defining the determine of the thinker in addition to the exercise of philosophizing. Thus, questions of sexual distinction and sexuality in addition to their metaphors can be central for a correct understanding of the determine of the thinker.
b) Plato’s philosophical arguments
Right here we take as our departure what has already been stated concerning the elenchus and the techne-analogy. We are going to analyse the Gorgias, the Protagoras and the Meno with the next questions in thoughts:
1) On condition that Socrates is profitable in undermining conventional or sophistic pondering (which isn’t all the time to be taken without any consideration), how ought to we perceive the optimistic outcomes of his investigations? Will we get a clearer view of the item, of a particular advantage, as an illustration? Or is the worth of the search to be discovered within the elimination of false notions? Or is it the tactic and method of sound philosophy that’s primarily displayed? Is the limitation of philosophy then additionally exhibited?
2) We are going to examine the Statesman, the Lesser Hippias and the Philebus within the gentle of those hypotheses: techne might include episteme to a larger or lesser diploma, as Plato appears to presuppose. Nevertheless, craft is talent in dealing with nature, not in fixing ethical or political questions, which had additionally been raised throughout the poetic custom. When Plato “takes the aspect” of the craftsmen, he appears to sign philosophy’s break with the best way the standard literature, particularly Homer and the tragedies, had been treating these questions. Alternatively, Plato is much much less within the data of artisans than he’s in politics and ethics. In different phrases, he’s epistemically dedicated to craft whereas he’s thematically engaged in normative questions. When the limitation of the techne-analogy is proven in several methods, is that this as a result of the character of normative questions doesn’t accommodate this method? If that’s the case, does this imply that philosophy can’t aspire to the form of data we might name episteme? In that case, will philosophical claims attain orthos doxa on the most? If this is so, the space between philosophy and different genres of knowledge will diminish.
Socrates, the thinker portrayed in a lot of the dialogues, is consistently engaged in some kind of argumentation. We are going to have a look at the arguments as such. They’ll, from a logical standpoint, seldom be thought of unequivocally sound. Ideas used are sometimes imprecise or ambiguous and liable to vary their that means. Once we attempt to assess the end result of a dialogical change, we frequently discover ourselves enveloped in ambiguity. Usually such ambiguity has to do with the narrative setting of the argumentation and with the usage of metaphor and analogy throughout the argumentation itself. This poses (a minimum of) two questions that we are going to look nearer into: Is Plato displaying us how context can detract from sound argumentation? Or is the purpose moderately that the perfect philosophical argumentation is all the time of this nature? Right here we are going to have a look at the Sophist, the Theaetetus and the Republic, Guide I.
(c) Plato’s dialogues and imitative poetry
When Plato within the tenth and last guide of the Republic distances himself from different types of artwork, it’s their mimetic character he presents as the inspiration of his argument. Whereas, nevertheless, the primary instance of mimetic artwork is portray, the primary goal of Plato´s argument is tragic poetry. We are going to subsequently pay particular consideration to the relation between Plato´s dialogues and the tragedies, particularly these of Sophocles, not solely in the case of poetic components, but additionally the standing of and relation between data and fact on the one hand and happiness of the person and the neighborhood on the opposite. Whereas Plato appears to scale back and even get rid of the importance of sexual distinction within the quest for fact and happiness, sexual distinction and sexual conflicts play a central half in a lot of the tragedies. It’s our speculation that this opposition is expounded to Plato´s criticism of the tragedies, each within the tenth guide of the Republic and elsewhere within the dialogues.
The tough criticism of the mimetic arts within the Republic and the truth that the dialogues themselves are mimetic dramatizations and closely depend on mimetic components generates the query whether or not it within the Platonic dialogues emerges a division between good and dangerous mimetic poetry. Finding out this matter engages us in nearer consideration of Plato’s personal use of poetic gadgets akin to imagery, model, language, setting, fable, characterization, irony, and so forth. This additionally makes it important to contemplate extra particular features of the dialogues inside their very own period and historic context, the place Plato was engaged within the creation of a brand new kind of literature – philosophy – which needed to win attraction by competing with the present modes of poetry and rhetoric.
Not solely does Plato use mimetic components in his dialogues, mimesis can be a key idea inside Plato´s personal pondering: imitation is for Plato a needed devise of gaining perception, not the least within the Republic, but additionally within the Symposium, within the so known as “ladder of affection”. Plato´s critique of mimetic poetry is thus greater than ambiguous and mimesis a moderately problematic idea in Plato´s dialogues.
*
The Ph.D. and the post-doc candidates who can be included within the venture, can be requested to do analysis alongside a number of of those three paths. We have already got one Ph.D candidate within the venture, Erlend Breidal, who obtained a scholarship in 2008, financed by the College of Arts on the College of Bergen. The title of his venture is “Socrates and the Stranger as emblematic figures for 2 completely different sorts of philosophy within the triology The Theaetetus, The Sophist and The Statesman”.
The broader context of the venture
The venture is developed inside a gaggle of students belonging to philosophy, literature and the classics. It has its base on the College of Bergen, however its community consists of researchers from Oslo, Tromsø, Denmark, Nice Britain and USA.
Our first worldwide convention, held in 2008, examined Republic X, the locus of Plato’s assault on tragic poetry. Various articles offered at this convention had been printed in Norsk filosofisk tidsskrift. The second convention, held in 2009, centered on the Phaedrus, which presents a fancy evaluation of the relationships between rhetoric and philosophical writing and speech. Some papers from this convention had been printed in Symbolae Osloenses.
Our third convention was held on the finish of Might 2011, specializing in Plato´s final dialogue, the Legal guidelines. On this dialogue, the Athenian Stranger, the dialogue’s essential speaker, goes as far as to name their legislative venture “the best and greatest tragedy” inasmuch because it goals to “dramatize a noble and ideal life”. (817b) Right here the Stranger highlights the significance of the connection between poetry and philosophy, and even means that this relation has robust moral implications. The convention explored these and associated questions. Along with Norwegian and Scandinavian members, the convention hosted three American audio system: professor Julia Annas, professor Hayden Ausland and professor Paul Woodruff.
We suggest to proceed with investigations of particular person dialogues by holding annual intensive examine periods and conferences, every time specializing in a specific dialogue. The dialogue that has been chosen for the fourth annual convention to be held in Bergen within the spring of 2012 can be Plato’s Symposium.
Mission members
The venture has its nucleus within the analysis group “Historical philosophy” on the Division of Philosophy, College of Bergen, however has a broad nationwide and worldwide community. The community consists of researchers from the fields of philosophy, literature and classics. All of us share a typical curiosity each in antiquity and within the poetical features of philosophy in addition to the philosophical features of poetry. Inside the community there are researchers at completely different ranges, from professors to aspiring doctoral college students. For extra particulars, see the hyperlink “Actions” on the best on the prime of this web page.
[1] Plato as Literature, by Tania L. Gergel The Journal of Hellenic Research © 2004 The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies.
