To the editor: Elected officers get political advantages from demonstrating generosity to victims of disasters (“California should move faster on clean energy. Some lawmakers want to take a break,” April 10). Throughout the context of local weather change, this could show short-sighted, even counterproductive. Sadly, the extent of common understanding of the local weather emergency is inadequate to guard and defend long-term laws when it conflicts with short-term, anti-climate calls for. That is significantly true when individuals are grieving the lack of a house — or a whole neighborhood.
I credit score columnist Sammy Roth for bravely going the place his deep understanding inexorably leads him. Present laws already are inadequate to fulfill the state’s emissions objectives. In the meantime, the monetary advantages of Meeting Invoice 306 to owners, if any, is paltry in comparison with the long-term prices of elevated air air pollution (unhealthy), elevated CO2 emissions (warming), sluggish electrification (slowed transition to wash power) and a long time of energy-inefficient new and current houses (wasted sources).
The idea of affordability has to broaden to incorporate the price of different neighborhoods going up in smoke, some for a second time. There is no such thing as a time left for procrastinating on the mandate that the local weather emergency represents. Elected officers ought to stand behind their lately handed, forward-thinking local weather laws.
Gary Stewart, Laguna Seaside
..
To the editor: Meeting Speaker Robert Rivas is on the incorrect monitor, if he thinks he can assist California housing prices with a six-year pause on new clear power guidelines. I’ve information for him: World warming is brought on by greenhouse gasoline emissions, and stopping clear power guidelines makes the issue even worse later. Rivas wants to seek out different financial savings in housing prices. These may embrace constructing smaller homes and residences at better densities. Higher metropolis planning can also be wanted, beginning with public transportation. World warming is proof against our considerations about reducing housing prices.
Carl Mariz, Irvine
