There isn’t any scarcity of hypothesis as to how a lot Elon Musk and his firms will profit financially from his enthusiastic embrace of President-elect Donald Trump. But I imagine that it’s Mark Zuckerberg, Mr. Musk’s lower-key, extra politically fluid tech-billionaire rival, who ought to be topped Silicon Valley’s wiliest operator within the halls of Washington.
That’s simply fantastic for Meta, Mr. Zuckerberg’s growing older social media empire. It’s dangerous information for the way forward for know-how and the reality.
Mr. Zuckerberg burst on the national political scene just a little over a decade in the past to advertise and fund left-leaning points he cared about, equivalent to drug legalization and lowering mass incarceration. When his platforms had been accused of spreading misinformation that will have helped elect Mr. Trump, Mr. Zuckerberg vowed to grapple with the issue. He kicked Mr. Trump off Facebook and Instagram for 2 years in mild of the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
So maybe it isn’t a complete coincidence that President Biden’s administration took some positions extremely favorable to Mr. Zuckerberg’s social media goliath. Congress has didn’t cross any significant regulation to curb the conduct of the social media giants, regardless of rising proof of their harms. And Mr. Zuckerberg’s sharp critiques of China, adopted up by extra discreet lobbying by Meta, helped persuade Congress and Mr. Biden to ban the video-sharing app TikTok, whose guardian firm is Chinese language — and likewise simply occurs to be Meta’s most modern and threatening rival.
Now, having kissed the ring of incoming President Trump — within the type of a dinner, the appointment of an expert preventing govt and Trump ally to the board of his firm and a $1 million donation by Meta to Mr. Trump’s inaugural fund — Mr. Zuckerberg has lastly come full circle. On Tuesday, he introduced that he’s dialing again the fact-checking operations designed to fight misinformation on Meta’s platforms — the sort of pretend information accused of doubtless serving to to elect Mr. Trump the primary time. This represents an enormous win for right-wing teams which have lengthy argued that efforts to fight misinformation are types of censorship and a middle finger to regulators. It’s a devastating blow to the reality.
“We’re going to work with President Trump to push again on governments around the globe going after American firms and pushing to censor extra,” Mr. Zuckerberg mentioned.
Whereas some Meta executives say his change of coronary heart was a long time coming, you’ve bought to confess that the timing of Mr. Zuckerberg’s huge public gesture is mighty handy. The Federal Commerce Fee’s lawsuit charging that Meta acquired Instagram and WhatsApp to keep up a social media monopoly goes to trial in April. The F.T.C. chair, Lina Khan, a Biden-era thorn in Huge Tech’s facet who shall be changed subsequent month, has already mentioned she hopes the president-elect gained’t let Meta off the hook.
By swinging each methods, Mr. Zuckerberg appears to be pulling off the spectacular feat of utilizing Democrats to take out a serious rival whereas utilizing Republicans to slash the big prices of attempting to guard the reality — all with out struggling main regulatory incursions from both to date. Not surprisingly, Meta inventory is close to its excessive.
To make his victory even sweeter, Mr. Zuckerberg paid simply peanuts for his win. Not like Mr. Musk, who, together with the entities he controls, poured $277 million into Mr. Trump’s electoral marketing campaign, campaigned alongside him and has been frequently staying in a cottage at Mar-a-Lago for the reason that election, Meta donated only that measly $1 million to the inaugural fund and Mr. Zuckerberg flew to Mar-a-Lago for that post-election dinner.
Whole victory shouldn’t be assured. This week, the Supreme Court docket is hearing an emergency appeal to the TikTok ban. Even when TikTok wins in court docket, it has been considerably weakened by the struggle, with many vital influencers diversifying their content material to incorporate Meta’s Instagram and Google’s YouTube in anticipation of a ban, probably taking their audiences together with them.
Even with Mr. Trump’s help, Mr. Zuckerberg’s struggle in opposition to worldwide legal guidelines requiring content material moderation may very well be troublesome. The European Union has handed legal guidelines requiring content material moderation that carry extraordinarily excessive fines for noncompliance: up to 6 percent of annual revenues.
All this successful masks a loss for technological progress. Mr. Zuckerberg shouldn’t be successful by innovating. He’s successful by enjoying politics. That speaks to the truth that his firm, whose major platforms at the moment are greater than 15 years previous, has been limping from one failed product to a different in the hunt for a supply for future progress.
As Fb and Instagram bought huge and the price of complying with rules across the globe rose, Mr. Zuckerberg positioned a $46 billion dollar bet on the Metaverse, a clunky virtual-reality world that required customers to put on headsets and work together with avatars that originally lacked legs. Shock: Nobody needed to hang around there.
Subsequent, Mr. Zuckerberg pivoted to synthetic intelligence. Regardless of spending tens of billions in a pricey race, Meta’s try to differentiate itself by constructing A.I. avatars for folks to work together with on social media is to date wanting like an embarrassing flop.
Within the meantime, Meta’s core merchandise — Fb, Instagram and WhatsApp — are more and more stuffed with A.I.-generated rubbish, spam and frauds. Eradicating content material moderation and fact-checking is more likely to make them worse, forcing all of us who use Meta’s platforms to struggle tougher to search out truthful, dependable data amid the deluge of dreck.
That is what it seems to be like when a mature enterprise runs out of concepts and as an alternative seeks to proceed its dominance by way of cash and political energy. It’s horrible for our data surroundings and our democracy.
It’s additionally an indication that Meta is susceptible to opponents providing the following huge thought. And I’m very a lot wanting ahead to the long run past it.
Supply {photograph} by Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters.
The Occasions is dedicated to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you concentrate on this or any of our articles. Listed below are some tips. And right here’s our e mail: letters@nytimes.com.
Observe the New York Occasions Opinion part on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, X and Threads.
