Re “Dear Boomers, the Student Protesters Are Not Idiots,” by Elizabeth Spiers (Opinion visitor essay, nytimes.com, Could 17):
Ms. Spiers’s characterization of the coed protests misses the mark. As a latest school graduate myself, I don’t disagree that school college students “are able to having effectively thought-out ideas,” however the ideas underlying these protests are troubling.
Ms. Spiers alludes to my era possessing elevated ethical sensibilities because of our expertise with mass shootings. However the requires “From the river to the ocean” and “Globalize the intifada” — ubiquitous in campus protests throughout the nation — would require the killing of harmless Israelis in apply, as Bret Stephens identified in “What a Free Palestine Actually Means” (column, Could 15).
If these chants are a part of effectively thought-out ideas and never naïveté, then it behooves us to scrutinize the ethical framework that informs these ideas.
Why is it that these protests undertaking outrage towards Israel’s conduct within the warfare however conveniently elide the horrific details of Oct. 7? If my era’s deal with on advanced world occasions is as complete as Ms. Spiers suggests, then why do the protests flatten Israel’s whole historical past into an illegitimate colonial undertaking? It’s not the protesters’ ways which might be uniquely troubling; it’s the worldview that evokes their actions.
Brian Silverstein
Chicago
To the Editor:
As a child boomer I’m heartened by the truth that there are pupil protests that replicate that the youthful era really cares and has perception about world occasions. I believe that the coed protests replicate the bravery and knowledgeable mind of younger protesters all through the establishments of upper training.
Child boomers would do effectively to replicate on their very own stodginess moderately than criticize younger college students for whom our era modeled energetic protest as a car for change.
Sahli Cavallaro
Sacramento
To the Editor:
Hillary Clinton’s voice stays a lonely voice within the media. Her argument just isn’t one that’s generally heard on the problem of pupil protests. But it is a crucial message that she expressed: The protesting college students are unaware of the historical past of relations between Israel and the Palestinians.
But these college students shout their misinformed arguments that achieve the eye of many within the media and the general public. Above all, the schools, establishments of educating and studying, have failed their very own college students.
As an alternative of calling within the police, as a substitute of capitulating to ill-informed calls for, why did the schools not reply by providing to finish the suspensions and expulsions of protesting college students in return for his or her required attendance at “teach-ins” to accumulate information of the historical past of Israel and the Palestinians?
Let this be a lesson for universities and professors for the following spherical of pupil demonstrations.
Vivian R. Gruder
New York
The author is emerita professor of historical past at Queens School, CUNY.
To the Editor:
As a former protester from the Vietnam Struggle period, I definitely agree with Elizabeth Spiers’s premise that school college students have the precise to peacefully protest and train their freedom of speech. What I discover so disturbing is that these college students are erroneously blaming the state of affairs in Gaza on President Biden and vowing to not vote for him.
Actually? They don’t perceive that by not voting for Mr. Biden, they’re voting for Donald Trump, who, by the way in which, has promised an expanded Muslim ban. This to me is idiotic.
Peggy Jo Abraham
Santa Monica, Calif.
To the Editor:
Elizabeth Spiers’s article seems to focus on a whole era in a disparaging and demeaning tone. Certainly Ms. Spiers is conscious that thousands and thousands of boomers protested the Vietnam Struggle in varied methods — writing letters to their representatives in Washington and gathering in parks and memorials throughout the nation. On Oct. 21, 1967, about 100,000 people, lots of them boomers, gathered close to the Lincoln Memorial as protesters towards that warfare.
Ms. Spiers, please don’t disparage a single era at a time when all generations ought to come collectively.
Timothy Pasquarelli
Anthem, Ariz.
To the Editor:
I’m 74 years outdated and am in full assist of scholars protesting, though I don’t agree with all their positions. I’ve only one query: The place have they been over the past eight years when our previous president barred people from several Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States and big cutbacks had been made to environmental legal guidelines, to say simply a few points?
I solely hope that what we’re seeing is the beginning of better pupil political consciousness, which is able to unfold and develop stronger.
Neither Donald Trump nor the present MAGA-dominated Republican Social gathering goes to go away until residents take to the streets and make it clear that they gained’t stand for undemocratic, bigoted and misogynistic legal guidelines or tax cuts created simply to profit extraordinarily rich conservatives.
Jon R. Tower
Pacific Palisades, Calif.
To the Editor:
To cite the political activist Carl Oglesby: “It isn’t the rebels who trigger the troubles of the world. It’s the troubles that trigger the rebels.”
Boomers, hear with curiosity to the rebels on school campuses and you’ll hear that their trigger is for us to care about what is going on on the earth and for universities to cease investing in corporations that present weapons for warfare. Universities shouldn’t be earning profits off of killing individuals!
Niobe Manner
New York
The author is a professor of utilized psychology at New York College and the writer of “Rebels With a Trigger: Reimagining Boys, Ourselves and Our Tradition.”
Religion, Household and the Republican Social gathering
To the Editor:
Re “The Authoritarians Have the Momentum,” by David Brooks (column, Could 17):
Mr. Brooks’s column, advising that liberals have conceded the “religion and household” vote, may need enlightened his readers as to how the presumptive authoritarian Republican nominee’s life experiences honor both one.
Clearly, the phrases “religion” and “household” have been hijacked merely to enrage working People into supporting wealth for the few, intolerance, rejection of training, information and science, and, most vital of all, worry.
Mr. Brooks may moderately have identified that the occasion that rejects the essential Christian values of affection of neighbor, forgiveness and tolerance in addition to a rise to the federal minimal wage, inexpensive medical health insurance, middle-class tax reform, office security, safety from weapons, and Social Safety and Medicare stability serves neither religion nor household, and hasn’t for many years.
Eric R. Carey
Arlington, Va.
Deep Dish Pizza? Meh!
To the Editor:
Re “That Deep Dish Pizza? It’s Not That Deep” (Meals, Could 15):
I’m an Italian American who grew up in what was then Chicago’s Little Italy within the Fifties, and thin-crust Neapolitan pizza was king.
Our native family-run pizzerias had been staffed by Italian immigrants, normally from Naples. Deep dish? Meh!
As I now not stay in Chicago, each time I meet fellow Chicagoans exterior the town and state, nearly all the time there are two “tribal” questions requested:
1. Are you Sox or Cubs?
2. Skinny-crust Neapolitan or deep dish?
My preferences are skinny crust and Chicago Cubs!
Steven Giovangelo
Indianapolis