President Trump is misreading his mandate. He ran on decreasing the price of residing, however the value of eggs goes up and he’s plotting to extend well being care premiums. He disavowed Mission 2025, however appears to be implementing it web page by web page.
Twenty years in the past, one other Republican president in the same place — elected with a margin of victory just like Mr. Trump’s, and beginning his time period with the same (although barely higher) approval score — misinterpret his mandate, too.
In early 2005, Democrats have been misplaced and reeling from defeat. However Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi didn’t simply sit again — they assembled a battle plan and carried it out with nice self-discipline. Democrats quickly discovered their footing, took again each homes of Congress within the midterms and set themselves up for a dominant victory within the subsequent presidential election. George W. Bush slunk out of workplace as one of many least common presidents in fashionable historical past.
In 2025, we will comeback if we observe their mannequin, which implies prioritizing good, winnable fights — and at all times with an eye fixed towards successful again energy.
Mr. Reid and Ms. Pelosi’s technique rallied the occasion round a clearly outlined set of Democratic priorities, particularly defending entitlements like Social Safety from cuts and privatization. This created a transparent distinction with Republicans over points the place the common voter was aligned with the Democrats and channeled grass-roots power into fights with Republicans over points that loved broad assist among the many public.
Elevating the profile of common fights whereas decreasing it for unpopular ones carried over to the 2008 main, which targeted on favorable points for Democrats together with well being care, ending tax giveaways to companies and cleansing up corruption in Washington — and helped ship essentially the most dominant general-election efficiency by both occasion on this century.
It’s value remembering that, like right now, Democrats have been deeply demoralized after shedding to Mr. Bush in 2004. He took credit score for a robust economic system and campaigned on tradition battle points like same-sex marriage and his stewardship of the Iraq battle to win re-election. He barely talked about entitlement reform on the path. But after his victory, he declared that he was going to make use of his “political capital” to denationalise Social Safety.
This was not what voters thought they have been getting, and Mr. Reid and Ms. Pelosi seized on that disconnect. In early 2005 they introduced that no Democrat would assist Social Safety privatization. Within the Senate, Mr. Reid arrange a first-of-its-kind communications battle room as Mr. Bush barnstormed the nation selling his plan.
Mr. Bush was having fun with a honeymoon interval, and Democrats have been underneath pressure to suggest their very own plan for altering Social Safety. However Mr. Reid and Ms. Pelosi had confidence — based mostly on each polls and expertise — that drawing a tough line on preserving this system was common. Additionally they knew that it was a problem core to the Democratic id, and one thing that everybody within the occasion — from Bernie Sanders to the reasonable Max Baucus of Montana — might get behind. It reminded voters why they preferred Democrats within the first place.
Crucially, Mr. Reid and Ms. Pelosi allowed their members leeway to work with Republicans on different points, like reauthorizing the Patriot Act. This flexibility confirmed voters that Democrats have been keen to be bipartisan and clear up issues. From a strategic perspective, it additionally remoted Social Safety as the primary flashpoint.
In distinction, throughout Mr. Trump’s first time period, Democrats took up each progressive trigger with zeal, and the occasion’s platform shifted consequently. The “protest each situation, in every single place” efforts of 2017-20 contributed power towards profitable midterm elections in 2018, however the occasion ended up veering too far left on too many points. Although Joe Biden gained a squeaker in 2020, Democrats on the entire underperformed, and the positions taken within the hothouse of the 2020 main got here again to hang-out Kamala Harris in 2024.
The occasion must internalize the concept that what we select to battle on now will form not simply the 2026 midterms, however the 2028 presidential race as properly.
The funds fights that can eat most of this yr current the proper alternative to implement the Reid-Pelosi playbook. But once more, defending entitlements is Democrats’ strongest situation. Latest polling reveals that messages about defending the US Company for Worldwide Growth or rolling again cuts from Elon Musk’s so-called Division of Authorities Effectivity initiative are weak, resonating with few voters outdoors the Democratic base. Against this, a message about defending core security web applications like Social Safety, Medicare and Medicaid from cuts attracts 68 p.c assist from all voters.
Every time Republicans want Democrats’ votes — whether or not it’s to maintain the federal government open or to boost the debt ceiling — Democrats ought to reply with clear, common calls for: promise to guard core social security web applications like Social Safety, or promise to not jack up well being care premiums to pay for tax cuts for the rich.
However self-discipline requires extra than simply specializing in successful points — it additionally means avoiding performative shows on points the place we’re far to the left of public opinion, since these episodes are inclined to go viral and crowd out our more practical messaging. Take international help: That is merely not a problem the general public prioritizes, and pictures of liberals protesting outdoors authorities buildings will solely feed the notion of Democrats as out of contact.
One of the best ways to revive international help is for Democrats to win again energy. Get together leaders ought to inform activists: If you wish to restore international help, protest Mr. Trump’s plan to slash the protection web.
It is usually not too early for Democrats to begin shaping their method to candidate recruitment for 2026. Once more, the Reid-Pelosi playbook is instructive. They used the disciplined concentrate on occasion priorities to construct a giant tent and recruited candidates whose stances mirrored their districts.
These candidates agreed on core points however diverged on others the place there was much less unanimity throughout the occasion. Consultant Heath Shuler was pro-gun and anti-abortion. Consultant Gabby Giffords was an immigration hawk. Senator Bob Casey was anti-abortion. However all of them needed to guard Social Safety.
As an alternative of imposing litmus exams, “what makes a Democrat a Democrat” ought to be answered with “supporting Social Safety, Medicare and Medicaid.” In any other case, candidates ought to be evaluated by how properly they’re matched to their districts and states, not progressive orthodoxy.
The best approach to cease Mr. Trump is to win again energy. In the event you sit wherever on the left facet of the spectrum — from the center-left to the far left — the problems you care about most shall be finest served by Democrats successful.
They in all probability wouldn’t have admitted it, however Mr. Reid and Ms. Pelosi have been guided by a dictum later articulated by their archnemesis, Mitch McConnell: “Winners make coverage and losers go house.”
Adam Jentleson is a former chief of workers to Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, a former deputy chief of workers to Senator Harry Reid of Nevada and the creator of “Kill Swap: The Rise of the Trendy Senate and the Crippling of American Democracy.”
The Occasions is dedicated to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you consider this or any of our articles. Listed here are some tips. And right here’s our electronic mail: letters@nytimes.com.
Observe the New York Occasions Opinion part on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
