The seminar held by the Pakistan Institute of Worldwide Affairs (PIIA) noticed analysis papers being learn out on the Pakistan-India battle.
Researcher Mohammad Usman stated that if India had been to cease the water move to Pakistan, it might threat flooding its personal higher areas.
“But when they stopped our water in the course of the dry seasons, it might be a priority for us as a result of the move of water is decrease and storage issues essentially the most. It may possibly have an effect on our farmers, which may lead to decrease yields,” Usman stated.
The researcher stated that even when India blocked water, it might require important infrastructure that will take years to construct and in addition billions of {dollars}.
He stated within the case of Pakistan and India, Pakistan is the decrease riparian state and India the higher riparian state. However within the case of China and India, China is the higher riparian state and India the decrease riparian state. “That is very true in Brahmaputra the place China may block India’s water,” he identified. PIIA chairperson Dr Masuma Hasan underscored the necessity to hear completely different voices, particularly the voices of the youth, concerning the latest battle.
Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the April 22 Pahalgam assault, which claimed 26 lives.
India carried out precision strikes as a part of Operation Sindoor on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir within the early hours of Might 7.
It was adopted by Pakistan’s try to assault Indian navy bases on Might 8, 9, and 10. The Indian facet responded strongly to the Pakistani actions.
The on-ground hostilities ended with an understanding of stopping the navy actions following talks between the administrators normal of navy operations of either side on Might 10.
