To the editor: Now that the unthinkable has occurred to many beachfront properties on Pacific Coast Freeway, maybe it’s time to rethink the rights of the individuals of the state of California concerning entry to the seaside. (“Here’s the hard question about homes that burned on PCH,” letters, Feb. 5.)
Anybody who has skilled the miles-long back-up of automobiles ready to get into restricted public parking, scarce and cleverly hidden public walkways and frantic pedestrians crossing a number of lanes of freeway only for a little bit of ocean respite is aware of this has been an inequitable drawback for many years.
Think about, then, my shock upon transferring from Pacific Palisades to Santa Barbara when I discovered miles and miles of attractive seashores able to be loved by everybody, accompanied by plentiful and free parking.
I paid taxes within the Palisades, I pay taxes in Santa Barbara. However in solely one among these locations, I get what I pay for. It’s certainly time to query the cheek-by-jowl rebuilding on PCH.
Jocelyn Weisdorf, Santa Barbara
..
To the editor: It’s attention-grabbing to learn a letter making the argument that maybe the properties on PCH misplaced within the Palisades hearth shouldn’t be rebuilt.
What individuals overlook is the large quantity in property taxes paid by homeowners on this space. Would the identical individuals who need an unobstructed view of the ocean be keen to cowl the loss in tax income?
Robert Launius, Oxnard
..
To the editor: Wow, what an insightful letter from a Instances reader on rebuilding (or not) destroyed properties between PCH and the Pacific Ocean.
PCH has probably not been the “Pacific Coast Freeway” for years; it’s extra just like the VCH, or “View Cutoff Freeway.”
No matter occurred to eminent area and the concept the coast needs to be accessible to all Californians?
Denys Arcuri, Indio
