Delhi College: A closing 12 months BA scholar claimed unjustly awarded an ‘F’ grade within the sensible examination of the topic titled ‘Kids with Incapacity in India’ in sixth semester outcomes for the educational session 2024–2025.
NEW DELHI: The Delhi Excessive Courtroom on Tuesday sought responses from the Delhi College and a university after a plea claimed a scholar and her total class was marked fail in an examination because of the negligence on the a part of the instructor and her establishment. Justice Vikas Mahajan issued discover to the Delhi College and Bhagini Nivedita Faculty for a stand on the scholar’s plea.
The plea has been filed by a final-year BA scholar from the faculty. She claimed of “arbitrarily and unjustly” being awarded an “F” grade within the sensible examination of the topic titled “Kids with Incapacity in India” in her sixth semester end result for the educational session 2024–2025.
The petitioner claimed of showing in idea, inner evaluation and the exterior sensible examination, which contains sensible file analysis, viva voce and a written examination. She additional claimed securing good marks in each the speculation and inner sensible elements, however alleged because of the “negligence and mismanagement” on the a part of the instructor involved and the faculty administration, the marks for the exterior sensible examination weren’t uploaded on the college portal.
Additionally learn DU UG CSAS 3rd round upgrade allotment results 2025 declared; verification process ends on August 6
Whole class awarded ‘F’ grade
“Consequently, your entire class, together with the petitioner, has been unjustly marked as ‘fail’ within the sensible element of the mentioned topic. Regardless of elevating repeated complaints by means of emails and different modes to the faculty and college authorities, no corrective motion has been taken until date,” the plea, filed by means of advocate Ashu Bidhuri, mentioned.
The instructor involved and the faculty administration, the plea mentioned, have been concerned in mutual blame-shifting as a substitute of resolving the error, leaving the petitioner and different similarly-affected college students with out redressal. The misguided end result has straight affected the scholar’s total CGPA and tutorial document, which can adversely affect her eligibility and prospects for greater schooling, aggressive exams similar to UGC-NET, and future tutorial pursuits, together with PhD admissions, the place tutorial grades are a vital issue, the plea mentioned.
Because of this, the scholar urged the courtroom to direct the authorities to include the precise marks obtained within the sensible examination and point out “cross” within the topic in query in a revised marksheet.
