Clarifying claims that Colorado mandated use of a person’s chosen name and pronouns

In late Could 2025, a rumor unfold on-line that Colorado lawmakers prohibited refusing to make use of an individual’s chosen identify and pronouns according to their gender id.

The claims spread on X and Facebook. Some of those claims specified that the regulation bans “misgendering” and “deadnaming” people — in different phrases, referring to somebody by a gender and/or identify they not establish with.

Nevertheless, these rumors look like spreading an outdated and exaggerated understanding of a official regulation handed in Colorado on Could 16, 2025, to make clear authorized protections for transgender individuals. The bill, named the Kelly Loving Act after a transgender lady who was killed in an anti-LGBTQ+ mass capturing at a Colorado homosexual bar, underwent main revisions earlier than it grew to become regulation.

An older version of the invoice sought to particularly outline misgendering and deadnaming as discriminatory acts below the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, which prohibits discrimination within the office, housing and in locations of public accommodation similar to parks, companies and libraries. Nevertheless, each phrases had been taken out of the laws. As a substitute, the law because it stands — as of this writing — states that refusing to make use of an individual’s chosen identify or respect how an individual chooses to be addressed can be utilized as proof in a grievance below the state’s anti-discrimination act.

This is what meaning.

Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act

Earlier than the Kelly Loving Act grew to become regulation, the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act already prohibited discrimination on the premise of “gender id” and “gender expression” because of a law handed in 2021.

That invoice outlined gender expression as “a person’s manner of reflecting and expressing the person’s gender to the skin world, usually demonstrated by look, gown, and habits.” It additionally outlined gender id as “a person’s innate sense of the person’s personal gender, which can or might not correspond with the person’s intercourse assigned at delivery.”

The Kelly Loving Act sought to “additional make clear that not using a person’s chosen identify is and can be utilized as proof of discrimination in a gender expression discrimination case,” stated state Democratic Rep. Rebekah Stewart, a sponsor of the invoice. It also added extra particulars to what “gender expression” means below the regulation, similar to “how an individual chooses to be addressed.”

Some claims stated that Colorado made it a “crime” to misgender or deadname somebody. That’s merely not true, as penalties for violating the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act are civil, not legal — any one who violates the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act could be fined $5,000 per plaintiff and/or different financial damages, as of a 2025 amendment to the regulation.

Additionally it is price noting that submitting a grievance below the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act doesn’t mechanically imply an employer or accused occasion could also be fined. For instance, with employment circumstances, there have to be “clear and convincing proof that the defendant engaged in a discriminatory or unfair employment observe with malice or reckless indifference to the rights of the plaintiff,” in accordance with a 2014 Colorado Bar Association publication (see Web page 4-3 below “Cures Underneath CADA”).

Nevertheless, “good-faith efforts to conform” and “stop discriminatory and unfair practices within the office” would end in no punitive damages for the defendant, per the publication.

Snopes requested a full copy of the newest model of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and can replace this story if we discover this language has modified. We additionally reached out to numerous regulation companies and civil rights teams for extra details about how the Kelly Loving Act could also be applied in reference to CADA and await replies.

Completely different variations of the Kelly Loving Act

Previous versions of the Kelly Loving Act specified inclusion of deadnaming and misgendering as acts of discrimination below the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act.

For instance, see the bill as introduced, which on Web page 9 outlined deadnaming as “purposefully, and with the intent to ignore the person’s gender id or gender expression, refer[ring] to a person by their delivery identify slightly than their chosen identify.” Equally, misgendering was outlined on the identical web page as “purposefully, and with the intent to ignore the person’s gender id or gender expression, refer[ring] to a person utilizing an honorific or pronoun that conflicts with the person’s gender id or gender expression.”

The invoice as launched additionally stated on Web page 2 that it outlined “deadnaming and misgendering as discriminatory acts within the ‘Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act’, and prohibit[ed] these discriminatory acts in locations of public lodging.”

In distinction, the bill as signed by the governor into regulation — out there on the bill page — made no express point out of deadnaming or misgendering. As a substitute, it merely provides “chosen identify” and different particulars to the definition of “gender expression,” which, once more, is already protected below the anti-discrimination act. See the related a part of the invoice, which is on Page 5, under, with the capitalized elements representing what the invoice provides to the preexisting regulation:

(3.5) “CHOSEN NAME” MEANS A NAME THAT AN INDIVIDUAL REQUESTS TO BE KNOWN AS IN CONNECTION TO THE INDIVIDUAL’S DISABILITY, RACE, CREED, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, GENDER EXPRESSION, MARITAL STATUS, FAMILIAL STATUS, NATIONAL ORIGIN, OR ANCESTRY, SO LONG AS THE NAME DOES NOT CONTAIN OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE AND THE INDIVIDUAL IS NOT REQUESTING THE NAME FOR FRIVOLOUS PURPOSES. 

(9) “Gender expression” means a person’s manner of reflecting and expressing the person’s gender to the skin world, usually demonstrated by look, gown, and habits, CHOSEN NAME, AND HOW THE INDIVIDUAL CHOOSES TO BE ADDRESSED.

It’s price noting that repeated misgendering and deadnaming have already been used as proof in profitable anti-discrimination federal courtroom circumstances. See, for instance, a landmark 2015 case often called Lusardi v. Department of the Army, which discovered that the Military discriminated towards a transgender lady, Tamara Lusardi, on the premise of intercourse in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. One of many items of proof used within the case was the repeated use of her delivery identify and male pronouns.

Thus, the Colorado invoice doesn’t outright prohibit individuals from utilizing a reputation or pronoun at odds with an individual’s gender expression — it merely strengthens preexisting anti-discrimination regulation within the state.

In observe, which means that selecting to not use an individual’s chosen identify or pronouns can be utilized as proof of harassment in an anti-discrimination case involving employment, housing or locations of public lodging. It doesn’t imply that the act of misgendering or deadnaming somebody is in itself unlawful.

Sources