California’s combat to rein in President Trump’s deployment of troops to Los Angeles hinges on a nineteenth century regulation with a a blood-soaked origin and a reputation that appears pulled from a spaghetti western movie.
In a pivotal ruling this week, Senior U.S. District Decide Charles R. Breyer ordered the federal authorities handy over proof to state authorities in search of to show that the actions of troops in Southern California violate the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which forbids troopers from implementing civilian legal guidelines.
“How President Trump has used and is utilizing the federalized Nationwide Guard and the Marines since deploying them at first of June is plainly related to the Posse Comitatus Act,” Breyer wrote Wednesday in his order authorizing “restricted expedited discovery.”
The Trump administration objected to the transfer and has already as soon as gotten a sweeping Breyer ruling that might’ve restricted White Home authority over the troops overturned by the ninth Circuit Courtroom of Appeals.
This time, the Northern District of California choose made clear he would “solely permit discovery as to the Posse Comitatus Act” — signaling what might be the state’s final stand battle to stop Marines and Nationwide Guard forces from collaborating in immigration enforcement.
The Posse Comitatus Act dates again to the aftermath of the Civil Struggle when the American authorities confronted violent resistance to its efforts to rebuild Southern state governments and implement federal regulation following the abolition of slavery.
The textual content of the regulation itself is slight, its related part barely greater than 60 phrases. But when it was enacted, it served because the authorized epitaph to Reconstruction — and a preface to Jim Crow.
“It has these very ignoble beginnings,” mentioned Mark P. Nevitt, a regulation professor at Emory College and one of many nation’s foremost consultants on the statute.
Earlier than the Civil Struggle, the U.S. army was saved small, partly to keep away from the sorts of abuses American colonists suffered beneath the British.
Authorities again then may marshal a crew of civilians, known as a posse comitatus, to help them, as typically occurred in California through the Gold Rush. States additionally had militias that might be known as up by the president to pad out the military in wartime.
However regulation enforcement by the U.S. army was uncommon and deeply unpopular. Historians have mentioned the usage of troopers to implement the Fugitive Slave Act — which noticed escaped slaves hunted down and returned to the South — helped spark the Civil Struggle.
In current weeks, the Trump administration has used constitutional maneuvers invented to implement the Fugitive Slave Act to justify utilizing troops to spherical up immigrants. Consultants mentioned leaders from the antebellum South demanded comparable enforcement of the regulation.
“The South was all for posse comitatus when it got here to the Fugitive Slave Act,” mentioned Josh Dubbert, a historian on the Rutherford B. Hayes Presidential Library in Ohio.
However by the point Congress despatched federal troops to start Reconstruction in earnest in 1867, the panorama was very completely different.
After white rioters razed Black neighborhoods in Memphis and mobs of ex-Accomplice troopers massacred Black demonstrators in New Orleans within the spring of 1866, “a lot of the South [was] was army districts,” mentioned Jacob Calhoun, a professor of American historical past at Wabash Faculty and an skilled on Reconstruction.
“Most students, not to mention the American public, don’t perceive the size of racial violence throughout Reconstruction,” Calhoun mentioned. “They solely ship these troops in after unimaginable ranges of violence.”
On the polls, Black voters have been met by white gangs in search of to stop them from casting ballots.
“For many of American historical past, the concept of an American military intervening in elections is a nightmare,” Calhoun mentioned. “[Posse Comitatus] is reemphasizing this longstanding perception however for extra nefarious functions.”
The Posse Comitatus language was tucked into an appropriations invoice by Southern Democrats after their celebration gained management of Congress within the election of 1876 — “presumably essentially the most violent election in American historical past,” Calhoun mentioned.
Historians say white lawmakers within the post-war South sought to enshrine their means to maintain Black males from voting by barring federal forces from bolstering the native militias that protected them.
“As soon as they’re in charge of Congress, they wish to lower the appropriations for the military,” Dubbert mentioned. “They connect this modification to [their appropriations bill] which is the Posse Comitatus Act.”
The invoice gained assist from some Republicans, who resented the usage of federalized troops to place down the Railroad Strike of 1877 — the primary nationwide labor strike within the U.S.
“It’s a second wherein white Northern congressmen give up the South again to ex-Confederates,” Calhoun mentioned. “With the Posse Comitatus Act, racial violence turns into the norm.”
But the statute itself largely vanished from reminiscence, little used for a lot of the subsequent century.
“The Posse Comitatus Act was forgotten for about 75 years, from after Reconstruction to mainly the Nineteen Fifties, when a protection lawyer made a problem to a bit of proof that the Military had obtained,” Nevitt mentioned. “The case regulation is [all] after World Struggle II.”
These circumstances have largely turned on troops who arrest, search, seize or detain civilians — “the traditional factor the LAPD does every day,” Nevitt mentioned. The courts have stood by the bedrock precept that army personnel shouldn’t be used to implement the regulation in opposition to civilians, he mentioned, besides in occasions of riot or different excessive eventualities.
“Our nation was cast largely as a result of the British army was violating the civil rights of colonists in New England,” Nevitt mentioned. “I actually cannot consider a extra essential query than the army’s means to make use of power in opposition to Individuals.”
But, the regulation is stuffed with loopholes, students mentioned — notably in relation to make use of of the Nationwide Guard.
Division of Justice has argued Posse Comitatus doesn’t apply to the army’s present actions in Southern California — and even when it did, the troopers deployed there have not violated the regulation. It additionally claimed the ninth Circuit choice endorsing Trump’s authority to name up troops rendered the Posse Comitatus subject moot.
Some consultants really feel California’s case is robust.
“You actually have army roaming the streets of Los Angeles with civilian regulation enforcement,” mentioned Shilpi Agarwal, authorized director of the ACLU of Northern California, “That is precisely what the [act] is designed to stop.”
However Nevitt was extra uncertain. Even when Breyer in the end guidelines that Trump’s troops are violating the regulation and grants the injunction California is in search of, the ninth Circuit will nearly actually strike it down, he mentioned.
“It will be an uphill battle,” the lawyer mentioned. “And in the event that they discover a solution to get to the Supreme Courtroom, I see the Supreme Courtroom siding with Trump as properly.”
This story initially appeared in Los Angeles Times.
©2025 Los Angeles Occasions. Go to latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
© Copyright 2025 The Los Angeles Occasions. All rights reserved. This materials will not be revealed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
