NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!
Of their seek for a overseas coverage “win” for Vice President Kamala Harris, International Coverage journal desires you to imagine that she saved democracy in Guatemala whilst you weren’t trying. However the two of us have spoken at length with its former president in 2022, and he tells a really completely different story.
Removed from saving Guatemala, the Biden-Harris administration’s dealing with of this small however regionally vital pro-American neighbor has been appalling. The vp has been significantly dangerous, treating former President Alejandro Giammattei like a miscreant baby she needed to reprimand.
Even when Giammattei supplied to close Guatemala’s southern border, thereby stemming the circulation to our open border, this administration gave him the back of the hand.
President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris on the Worldwide Brotherhood of Electrical Staff (IBEW) Native 5 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on Sept. 2, 2024. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP through Getty Pictures)
Giammattei complained to us repeatedly how the Biden-Harris ambassador plotted with indigenous leaders, exerted strain on him to not appoint the legal professional common of his selecting, Consuelo Porras, and refused his supply of serving to to repair the border.
GOV. ABBOTT DISMISSES BIDEN-HARRIS VICTORY LAP NARRATIVE AS TEXAS BORDER CROSSINGS PLUNGE
“We mentioned to [U.S. officials] ‘You have got a big border with Mexico. We now have a small border with Honduras and El Salvador. Assist us shut that one,’” Giammattei mentioned. The Biden administration declined.
The border remained open, and hundreds of thousands, including Guatemalans, continued to pour into the U.S. Harris refused to even reply to the issues Giammattei raised, as a substitute repeating apparently scripted statements.
Ultimately, as migration reached chaotic proportions, the Biden-Harris administration turned as a substitute to the extremely corrupt Mexican authorities for assist, undermining U.S. efforts to safe cooperation on different priorities, together with the fentanyl disaster.
This conduct was a part of a world sample during which Biden and Harris selected regional winners and losers not on how a lot they help America and her values, or on whether or not they have been keen to be good companions, however on a liberal ideological litmus check that constantly elevated Marxists even when a extra conservative ally was providing materials help on a significant U.S. nationwide safety disaster: the wide-open southern border.
KAMALA HARRIS AND THE SOUTHERN BORDER CRISIS: A TIMELINE
Thus, Biden and Harris have embraced Brazil’s Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Colombia’s Gustavo Petro and Chile’s Gabriel Boric, all Marxist presidents who harbor a long-standing animus towards the “Yanki imperialists.” Against this, they’ve disdained and rebuked Argentina’s Javier Milei, Paraguay’s Santiago Peña and Guatemala’s Giammattei.
Their sin? Being pro-life, pro-market, and pro-Israel, however most significantly, pro-American.
If this doesn’t sound like an strategy that protects American pursuits, it’s as a result of it’s not.
However because the Biden-Harris prime Latin American knowledgeable on the Nationwide Safety Council, Juan Gonzalez, informed a closed-door assembly, the Biden-Harris administration backed Lula over President Trump ally Jai Bolsonaro in Brazil’s 2022 election though they knew “he’ll trigger overseas coverage issues” for the US.
“It’s political,” somebody on the assembly quoted Gonzalez as saying.
HARRIS DOUBLES DOWN ON SUPPORT FOR LEFT-WING BENEFIT FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS: ‘SMART SOLUTIONS’
As well as, in 2023, the administration greenlighted sending Democrat Occasion fixers Robert Gibbs (Barack Obama’s former spokesman), Jessica Reiss and Dan Restrepo (a private good friend of Juan Gonzalez) to Buenos Aires in a useless try to assist the leftist candidate, Sergio Massa, defeat Milei throughout elections.
And simply final month, the pro-U.S. authorities of President Peña in Paraguay requested Washington to recall our ambassador in Asuncion for interfering in home affairs.
In Guatemala, after spending three years treating Giammattei just like the vassal chief of a banana republic, Biden-Harris didn’t simply back a radical, Bernardo Arevalo, in final 12 months’s election. After he received, the administration utilized all method of strain to ensure that an investigation of his occasion for alleged irregularities in its authorized registration by the legal professional common, Consuelo Porras, didn’t bear fruit.
HOW WOULD A PRESIDENT HARRIS HANDLE IMMIGRATION, BORDER CRISIS?
In December, the State Division took the extraordinary step of hitting 300 Guatemalans, one-third of them members of Congress, with visa restrictions for alleged “ongoing anti-democratic actions” to additional tip the size towards Arevalo. This got here simply because the Biden-Harris administration was eradicating sanctions on the antagonistic Maduro regime in Venezuela.
It’s these very interferences abroad’s electoral system that International Coverage’s author, Robbie Gramer, celebrates. Bernardo Arevalo, Gramer gushed, “very seemingly owed his presidency to U.S. diplomatic intervention.” That, we’re imagined to imagine, is an effective factor.
Arevalo has since turn out to be the brand new darling of the worldwide left; the Marxist web site Peoples Dispatch calls him “probably the most progressive president Guatemala has had within the final 40 years.”
BIDEN-HARRIS ADMIN REFUSES TO REVEAL NATIONALITIES OF TERROR WATCHLIST MIGRANTS NABBED AT BORDER
Gramer paints the investigation of Arevalo as an try by Giammattei to dam Arevalo’s transition. Solely after Biden and Harris utilized the screws (“saved democracy”) did Giammattei desist. What was in truth taking place was the Guatemalan system sorting itself out, albeit slowly. That continues to at the present time: the Guatemalan Supreme Courtroom simply final week rejected Arevalo’s bid to strip Porras of her immunity.
What Gramer does doc is identical lawfare the administration wages at residence, however utilized overseas, whereas spuriously insisting that it’s on the aspect of democracy towards autocratic opponents.
Within the U.S., too, the Justice Division’s special counsel, Jack Smith, has simply re-indicted Donald Trump for questioning the outcomes of the 2020 election – one thing Democrats used to do routinely. Even Democrat strategist Mark Penn needed to admit that “the try to show the election challenges right into a prison conspiracy at this level is Jack Smith and the Justice Division interfering within the election.”
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
Gramer’s article has all of the hallmarks of being planted by the Biden-Harris administration, seemingly Harris’ prime nationwide safety consigliere Phil Gordon himself.
Gramer tells us he was given entry to a letter that Gordon took to Arevalo final January when he went all the way down to Guatemala Metropolis for the inauguration, and quotes all through the piece “a senior administration official acquainted” with hours of conferences that Gordon held in Guatemala.
Lastly, Gramer writes, “The democratic transition in Guatemala represents one of many clearest victories of U.S. President Joe Biden’s agenda to advertise democracy worldwide, in addition to a uncommon instance of Vice President Kamala Harris’ national security team enjoying a definite and direct position in shepherding it by.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Some victory. This heavy-handed intervention by the vp’s workers will solely cement the overall impression that America rides roughshod over our neighbors whatever the penalties.
And in the actual world, one of the best ways to advertise regional democracy is to respect its course of and officers, not attempt to exploit it to remake Latin America within the excessive ideological picture of the Biden-Harris administration.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM VICTORIA COATES
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM MIKE GONZALEZ
Mike Gonzalez is Heritage’s Angeles T. Arredondo senior fellow. Heritage is listed for identification functions solely. The views expressed on this article are the authors’ personal and don’t replicate any institutional place for Heritage or its Board of Trustees.
