MPs vote for assisted dying invoice by majority of 55
The Speaker is studying out the outcomes:
Ayes: 330
Noes: 275
Key occasions
-
How MPs voted on assisted dying bill, by party affiliation
-
MPs vote for assisted dying bill by majority of 55
-
MPs vote on assisted dying bill
-
Robert Jenrick claims bill will be changed ‘fundamentally’ by ‘activist judges in Strasbourg’ if it’s passed
-
No 10 hints Louise Haigh’s resignation linked to breach of ministerial code
-
David Davis backs bill, but says government should allocate four days for its report stage debate
-
Heidi Alexander becomes transport secretary
-
Badenoch says she’s against bill, citing teenager gender treatment as example of why NHS safeguards too weak
-
Death, for many, is ‘misery, torture and degredation’, not something noble, says Kit Malthouse, backing bill
-
Diane Abbott says she worries about people feeling they have to die because they’re burden,
-
Kruger urges MPs not to back ‘state suicide service’ and ‘worse world, with different idea of human value’
-
Danny Kruger urges MPs to vote down bill if they have reservations, as he gives opening speech from its opponents
-
Leadbeater rejects claims bill will be ‘slippery slope’, leading to scope of assisted dying being expanded
-
Leadbeater says she is open to toughening wording of bill to protect people with learning disabilities
-
Kim Leadbeater opens debate on her assisted dying bill
-
Speaker says MPs will not get vote on amendment that would have blocked bill to allow full policy review instead
-
How the debate, and voting, will take place
-
What is the real view on the assisted dying bill in Downing Street?
-
MPs to start debating assisted dying bill at 9.30am
-
Haigh says her conviction based on ‘genuine mistake’, and claims court accepted this
-
Tories say Starmer’s decision to put Haigh in cabinet when he knew of her conviction ‘obvious failure of judgment’
-
Starmer tells Haigh she has ‘huge contribution to make in future’ as he accepts her resignation
-
Louise Haigh resigns as UK transport secretary after admitting phone offence
Right here is the graphic from the Commons website illustrating the voting.
How MPs voted on assisted dying invoice, by social gathering affiliation
Listed below are the variety of MPs voting by social gathering.
Conservatives: 23
Impartial: 1
Greens: 4
Labour: 234
Lib Dems: 61
Plaid Cymru: 3
Reform UK: 3
SDLP: 1
Alliance: 1
Conservatives: 92
DUP: 5
Independents: 14
Labour: 147
Lib Dems: 11
Plaid Cymru: 1
Reform UK: 2
TUV: 1
UUP: 1
Conservatives: 3
Deputy Audio system: 3
Labour: 18
SNP: 9
Sinn Fêin: 7
SDLP: 1
Speaker: 1
The division listing for the vote is now on the Commons’ website.
Keir Starmer was seen having a chat with Nigel Farage within the chamber because the division was happening. That is from the i’s Eleanor Langford.
Keir Starmer is now within the Chamber having simply solid his vote on the assisted dying invoice
He had a fast chat with Nigel Farage earlier than taking his seat on the entrance bench
Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker, says the Commons is now shifting on to cope with a invoice about ferrets (the animal welfare [import of dogs, cats and ferrets] invoice – one other non-public member’s invoice, tabled by Danny Chambers) and he suggests some MPs may wish to go away the chamber.
Kim Leadbeater, sponsor of the invoice, is shifting a movement saying the general public invoice committee for the invoice ought to have the ability to take proof.
That goes by means of on the nod.
(Usually authorities payments committees have this energy, however not committees coping with non-public members’ payments.)
MPs vote for assisted dying invoice by majority of 55
The Speaker is studying out the outcomes:
Ayes: 330
Noes: 275
Keir Starmer has voted for the invoice.
The tellers for the ayes are Sarah Owen and Bambos Charalambous.
And the tellers for the noes are Harriett Baldwin and Florence Eshalomi.
MPs vote on assisted dying invoice
MPs at the moment are voting.
That is the second studying division.
Package Malthouse stood up and moved “that that query now be put”. That could be a closure movement. When MPs are debating non-public member’s invoice, supporters usually must name a closure movement vote to cease the controversy being talked out and to make sure that the home can transfer on to a correct vote.
Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker, referred to as the closure movement by acclamation. Nobody opposed it, and so he moved on instantly to the second studying vote.
Alex Davies-Jones, a justice minister, is winding up now the federal government.
She says she is talking not as a constituency MP, however as a minister within the division liable for the administration of the regulation. She won’t specific her private views now, she says. However she might be voting, she says.
If MPs vote for the invoice, the federal government will “respect its responsibility to the statute e-book” and guarantee any invoice is workable.
She pays tribute to the best way Kim Leadbeater has campaigned on this, and argued her case with respect and dignity.
Two frontbenchers at the moment are winding up.
Kieran Mullan, a shadow justice minister, is summing up for the opposition. However it’s a free vote, so there isn’t any social gathering place to sum up. Mullan says even one of the best ache reduction can not assist some people who find themselves dying.
However he additionally acknowledges that opponents of the invoice, who place a premium on the sanctity of life, have an excellent argument.
He says MPs ought to vote with humility, and with respect for every vote solid, in whichever route.
If you wish to learn the controversy, Hansard could have full transcript on-line here.
At this level the web model covers all speeches as much as Package Malthouse’s. The transcript is generally about three hours behind proceedings within the Commons. The entire thing needs to be up by 5.30pm.
Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker, calls Vikki Slade, the Lib Dem MP. He says hers would be the closing speech earlier than the wind-ups.
Kim Leadbeater makes a degree of order. She says she desires to right the report. She says in her speech earlier she mentioned she had consulted the medical career and the judiciary on the highest ranges. She says she has been in correspondent with the Judicial Workplace. However she says the serving judiciary haven’t expressed a view on the invoice, and she or he desires to make that clear.
The Labour MP Florence Eshalomi mentioned that she was against the invoice partly as a result of minority teams could be notably weak. She defined:
We should recognise the arduous fact that well being inequalities are large and protracted. We all know that black and minority ethnic disabled folks have far worse well being outcomes than the nationwide common.
I’ve seen this first-hand, caring for my mom who suffered with sickle cell anaemia.
As an adolescent, I might be by her facet when she was in excruciating ache, explaining to a health care provider who wouldn’t consider her when she instructed them she wanted lifesaving medicine, and sadly that is nonetheless the fact at present.
I’m reminded of the loss of life of Evan Smith on April 25 [2019] at North Middlesex Hospital.
Evan suffered from sickle cell too. He was in a lot ache that he needed to ring 999 from his hospital mattress as a result of he was denied oxygen and fundamental care by the medical doctors.
Put merely: we needs to be serving to folks to dwell snug, pain-free lives on their very own phrases earlier than we take into consideration making it simpler for them to die …
How can we be presumably glad that this invoice would ship equality and freedom in loss of life when we don’t but have this in life?
The Inexperienced social gathering MP Siân Berry instructed MPs within the debate that she was in favour of the invoice.
Whereas we don’t have to decide on between this Invoice and higher palliative care, we do have to offer dying folks the appropriate to decide on which ending is true for them, so please, please vote for this invoice at present.
Robert Jenrick claims invoice might be modified ‘basically’ by ‘activist judges in Strasbourg’ if it is handed
Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, instructed MPs that he was against the invoice and that, if it handed, “activist judges in Strasbourg” would change it. He defined:
Let’s take into consideration the position of judges. The check which is to be utilized is a low one, it’s the civil regulation threshold, this can be a stability of possibilities. This implies a choose might see actual danger of coercion and nonetheless sign-off this particular person for assisted loss of life; if the edge was not reached of fifty% or extra, the choose would sign-off the person.
I fear, actually I’m as sure as night time follows day, this regulation if handed will change. Not because of the people on this chamber or within the Lords, however because of judges in different places.
We’ve seen that repeatedly. It might be on both facet of the controversy however it’ll occur. This act, if handed, might be topic to activist judges in Strasbourg [where the European court of human rights is based]. They’ll change it basically and we’ve got to be ready for that. I don’t wish to see that occur.
Jenrick was talking from the backbenches, not as a celebration spokesperson. However when he was standing to be Conservative chief, calling for withdrawal from the ECHR was his most essential coverage proposal.