There was once 14 head-on collisions and two deaths on San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge yearly. In 2015, the authorities put in a central barrier and site visitors deaths fell to zero.
Why not set up a median barrier on all roads in America? The reply is it might value an excessive amount of. The choice about the place to place security options, says Bjorn Lomborg, the Danish political scientist and excessive priest of cost-benefit evaluation, reveals society’s willingness to pay for an additional life. In America, a human being seems to be value $10mn.
Although Lomborg is most well-known as “the sceptical environmentalist” whose 1998 e book of that title and subsequent ones comparable to False Alarm outraged local weather change activists, his core curiosity is the seemingly dry however really riveting subject of cost-benefit ratios. His Copenhagen Consensus Middle think-tank, based in Denmark and now registered as a non-profit within the US, spends its time crunching numbers and sifting educational papers, on the lookout for the very best methods societies can spend their cash.
“I hope to supply a tailwind to good concepts and a headwind to dangerous concepts,” he says, advocating, for instance, extra spending on coronary heart illness prevention, which is reasonable, and fewer on curing most cancers, which is pricey.
Not surprisingly, Lomborg stirs fierce feelings. He has been accused of cherry-picking information, flouting scientific methodology and of sporting T-shirts in inappropriate settings. He has been forged as a heartless rationer and a peddler of false dichotomies. At a e book occasion in Oxford, somebody shoved a baked Alaska pie in his “smug face”. A former head of the UN local weather panel in contrast him to Hitler. Each by the way ended up as his buddies.
A blond pin-up for the Heritage Basis, a rightwing think-tank, and admired by individuals like Joe Rogan, the Donald Trump-endorsing podcaster on whose present he lately appeared, Lomborg is tough to pigeonhole. Invoice Gates consults him and Lomborg spends his time worrying about the way to spend help in poor international locations. He’s pro-trade and pro-immigration, not precisely typical rightwing positions.
So who’s he, I ponder as I stroll by means of the crisp blue mild of London’s Docklands. He has chosen the Bonnane Restaurant & Pizzeria, a big glass and chrome affair with a view throughout the Thames of the spiky, hedgehog-reminiscent O2 Enviornment dome.
“I really like pizza and we might incorporate this into the dialog,” he had written considerably unpromisingly, although a minimum of he’s getting into into the spirit of Lunch with the FT.
He arrives useless on time. Although he’s simply turned 60, he wears tight-fitting garments over a lean physique and retains the shaggy mop that gave him his edgy look when he burst on to the staid statistical scene.
He seems to be fairly clean-living. He doesn’t drink and drive. Actually, he doesn’t drink or drive. He doesn’t smoke. As a baby rising up in Aalborg in North Jutland, the place he lived along with his mom, a trainer, and his stepfather, a New Age priest {and professional} double-bassist, he was often called “the monk”.
There may be nonetheless one thing of the proselytiser about him. He arrives with a bit pamphlet bearing his 12 greatest concepts.
His uncommon childhood, he says, gave him a thick pores and skin. “One thing I learnt very early on was that it doesn’t matter for those who don’t fairly slot in.”
Lomborg is in London to attend the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (Arc) gathering, a three-day “rightwing Davos” and a pageant of Christian nuclear-family values. Lomborg, who’s homosexual and is in London along with his Swedish boyfriend, was invited to hitch Arc’s advisory board by Jordan Peterson, the psychologist and tradition warrior.
What’s a person who describes himself as a “left-leaning Scandinavian” doing with all these conservatives? If these are usually not his individuals, isn’t he simply being “a helpful fool” for the likes of Elon Musk, who desires to place US worldwide help “into the wooden chipper”, and for fossil gas firms who lap up his message that oil shouldn’t be the enemy?
The Arc gathering “has a bit an excessive amount of God for my style”, he concedes in his American-tinged Danish accent. “However I need each the fitting and the left wing to be higher knowledgeable. I’m simply saying, there are extremely good issues to do if you wish to assist. I don’t suppose I’m a helpful fool. I believe I’m a helpful good man.”
I wish to discuss the abrupt suspension of US help, which left American meals rotting in African ports and sufferers with out their HIV meds. However first we should always order.
“I’ve been a vegetarian since I used to be 11,” he says, one other trait that marks him out from militant carnivores comparable to Peterson and Rogan. “However I’m the type of vegetarian who doesn’t like greens. I hate cooked greens, tender squishy issues. I’m like, ‘why, why?’ Italians know the way to prepare dinner vegetarian delicacies correctly.”
Menu
Bonnane Restaurant & Pizzeria
Unit G7, Capital East, 17 Western Gateway, London E16 1AQ
Caprese salad x2 £16
Spaghetti cacio e pepe £15
Sea bass fillet £27
Number of ice cream £5
Bottle glowing water x2 £9.80
Sprite x2 £7.80
Cappuccino x2 £7
Complete inc tax and repair £104.55
We every order a Caprese salad adopted by spaghetti cacio e pepe in his case and sea bass in mine.
“Now you’re alleged to nod and say that’s an excellent selection,” he says, mock-reproaching the waiter, who seems to be barely nonplussed on the joke.
For drinks, Lomborg pushes the boat out with a Sprite Zero. I stick virtuously to glowing water.
I flip to the assault by Trump on US help, suspended by means of an govt order that declared a lot cash is wasted on tasks “antithetical to American values”. Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, has stated that any further each greenback spent have to be justified by three questions: “Does it make America safer? Does it make America stronger? Does it make America extra affluent?”
Sir Keir Starmer, Britain’s prime minister, additionally introduced this week that the UK would reduce its already diminished abroad help funds to 0.3 per cent of GDP, as a way to fund a rise in defence spending.
I ponder how this sits with Lomborg, a lot of whose writing is underpinned by a utilitarian philosophy of making the best happiness for the best variety of individuals. Utilitarianism has been criticised as coldly calculating. Consider Charles Dickens’ Thomas Gradgrind, the fact-grinding industrialist. But it surely additionally prioritises the better good.
“It’s really a really humanistic worldview. The place is the world’s low-hanging fruit, the largest bang for the buck? That’s usually the world’s poor,” he says. A greenback spent in a poor nation tackling primary issues comparable to stopping malaria or offering youngsters with instructional supplies goes a lot additional than a greenback spent in a wealthy nation. That’s exactly what he’s advocating.
The waiter, a mild-mannered fellow, returns with the Caprese. Lomborg’s lengthy legs are stretched out to the aspect of our desk and I’ve visions of an accident involving flying mozzarella. The salad, safely delivered, seems to be wonderful, with top-quality cheese, olive oil and succulent slices of tomato.
Lomborg’s newest e book, Greatest Issues First, presents 12 insurance policies, costed at $35bn, that he claims would add $1.1tn to creating world output and save 4.2mn lives a 12 months — the equal, he says, of stopping a jumbo jet stuffed with passengers crashing each hour.
That appears like a discount, I say, however wouldn’t it cross the Trumpian check? If there have been no People on board these jets, how would stopping them from crashing additional US pursuits?
“I don’t think about Trump would say, ‘I don’t care in any respect about different individuals.’ However he cares much less about different individuals — and admittedly so does everyone else.”
As an example his level, Lomborg elaborates on a narrative from Adam Smith, the Scottish economist and thinker. Somebody who cuts their finger on a newspaper whereas studying about earthquake victims in a distant a part of the world is extra prone to be anxious about their finger, he says, and Trump is acknowledging that primary fact. If we actually valued all human life equally, wealthy international locations would ship most of their tax {dollars} to poor international locations the place it might do most good.
“Do I want it had been completed in a different way?” he says of Trump’s slash-and-burn method. “In all probability. However we’ve tried to reform how help works for many years and failed. So now I’m kind of pondering, ‘It’s occurred. Let’s get the very best out of it.’”
Lomborg’s underlying assumption, I say, is that help shouldn’t be working, one thing you can simply dispute given massive advances in baby mortality and the like. He additionally assumes assets are stretched. However aren’t we quibbling over tiny quantities right here?
Take US spending on help, which, at roughly $70bn in 2023, works out at lower than 0.3 per cent of GDP. As one individual in South Africa put it to me, “No matter occurred to Christian compassion?”
“Most individuals wish to do some bit of fine,” Lomborg says. “They wish to spend one thing, and that’s why we should always spend properly.”
Our mains have arrived and Lomborg begins to twirl closely peppered spaghetti round his fork. My fish is flaky, with a buttery lemon sauce.
I say I’m shocked at how relaxed he appears to be in regards to the destruction of the US Company for Worldwide Growth (USAID). Musk’s “wooden chipper” analogy, with its echo of the body-disposing scene in Fargo, struck me as purposefully merciless.
That could be, Lomborg counters, however finite assets must be spent effectively. “It’s like a menu. We’re not saying you may’t have the costliest stuff. We’re simply saying for those who order the caviar and the champagne, you received’t have as a lot cash left over,” he says, motioning to the waiter for a second glass of bubbly (Sprite Zero).
In his drive for effectivity, Lomborg seeks to determine insurance policies that, in line with his think-tank, generate returns of a minimum of $15 for each greenback spent. Some help passes his check, however most doesn’t. A small proportion is frivolous, he says, citing German funding of Peruvian bike lanes and a £200,000 British grant for all-female Chinese language opera.
“It’s not that I’m in opposition to feminine opera in Shanghai, it’s simply that, given youngsters die of malaria and a few are getting horrible training, I believe we have to have a way of precedence. I believe we’ve type of misplaced that within the growth neighborhood. What Trump is saying is ‘Let’s in the reduction of on the crap.’”
That strikes me as a fantastically beneficiant interpretation of what Trump is saying. However first I wish to hear extra about Lomborg’s massive concepts. May he actually save 4.2mn lives a 12 months for $35bn, which is, as he factors out, lower than 1 / 4 of the quantity the world spends on pet meals?
His proposals embrace fairly normal — if exactly laid-out — interventions on the way to forestall malaria, deal with tuberculosis and implement childhood immunisation programmes. However in addition they embrace much less apparent ones: use e-procurement to cut back corruption; display screen for hypertension; strengthen land tenure to encourage farmers to boost yields; facilitate expert migration and (good luck with this one) scale back tariffs.
Every has a physique of educational analysis behind it and detailed calculations. His favoured instructional reform, for instance, is to enhance outcomes in international locations comparable to Malawi by educating youngsters in line with their degree, not their age. Many youngsters, crammed into huge courses, fall hopelessly behind. Lomborg’s answer is to show for one hour a day utilizing tablets with adaptive software program, giving youngsters the advantage of a superb curriculum delivered at their very own tempo. Implementing it, in line with his think-tank, would value $9.8bn and ship a $604bn enhance to earnings by means of better-educated youngsters.
“That is spinach for the world. I need individuals to learn about it.”
With all these meals metaphors, I say, maybe he considers himself the minister of low-hanging fruit? He likes the concept. “However positively not of cooked greens,” he laughs.
I wish to quiz him on his methodology, which seeks to make easy numerical calculations about complicated issues like human life and academic outcomes. A Norwegian help professional had advised me that Lomborg undervalued the programs required to ship his magic-bullet options. How, for instance, might you roll out vaccines successfully with out roads, chilly storage or a functioning well being system?
In his methodology, I level out, constructing infrastructure, which may be very costly, doesn’t come out as cost-efficient. But weren’t roads and ports a prerequisite for China’s explosive development, which has completed extra to raise individuals out of poverty than all of the world’s help mixed?
He concedes that cost-benefit evaluation would possibly miss some essential components, however he defends his turf. “We use the very best information we’ve got proper now. It doesn’t imply it’s true, however it’s actually higher than not utilizing the very best information we’ve got proper now.”
One other apparent drawback, I say, is tipping factors. It was cost-benefit evaluation that led him to argue in opposition to spending cash on reducing carbon emissions. “If you wish to assist poor individuals in poor international locations, you’re higher off worrying about tuberculosis than you are attempting to make them marginally cooler in 100 years’ time,” he says.
However doesn’t that assume linear change? Absolutely the worry about local weather change is that we’ll cross a threshold when, say, the Gulf Stream collapses, sending the planet right into a horrible suggestions loop? Equally, Lomborg is pretty relaxed in regards to the tempo of extinction. However what occurs if nature all of a sudden snuffs out some ingredient of life — a plankton or a microbe as but unknown to science — setting off a trophic cascade with cataclysmic penalties?
He nods enthusiastically whereas I’m speaking, however then pushes again. “Tipping factors are good bogeymen. There’s a whole lot of potential issues that may go unsuitable,” he says, mentioning meteors which may crash into Earth, cell telephones which may rot our brains and bioterrorists who would possibly paralyse our cities. “However you may’t spend on all the things.” Potential catastrophes are fundraising instruments, he says. “I make up a scary situation. Now give me all of your cash.”
The solar is streaming into my eyes and I’m getting terribly sizzling. Lomborg asks the waiter to decrease the blind, which instantly solves the issue. He doesn’t deny man-made local weather change, however thinks we’ve got exaggerated the impression and will spend our cash on extra instant issues whereas we await technological innovation. This results in a dialogue of his most well-liked geoengineering options to local weather change, together with one thing known as marine cloud brightening, which purports to make use of clouds to mirror the solar’s rays.
For dessert, Lomborg is vacillating between apple pie and ice cream. He ultimately settles on two scoops of strawberry and certainly one of pistachio. “I’m like a 12-year-old. I really like sweet, I really like soda,” he enthuses. I’m prioritising my blood-sugar ranges and go for a cappuccino.
Numbers, he concedes, don’t all the time seize actuality. Considered one of his 12 greatest insurance policies is to encourage high-skilled immigration. The maths are pretty easy. If an individual strikes from a low-wage financial system to a high-wage one, their earnings can go up 15 occasions or extra for doing the identical job — whether or not it’s working in McDonald’s or as a mind surgeon.
However the maths run into real-world political and cultural issues. “For those who deliver two billion extra individuals to the west, that can most likely change the west — and never all for the great. That’s why a whole lot of democracies are going to say no.”
Nonetheless, Lomborg stays satisfied in regards to the logic of his message. “I need individuals to know there are superb issues we will do. However we’ve got to do the very best issues first,” he says, cheekily working within the title of his e book.
“That is on the FT, proper?” he says as he stands to go away.
I verify that that is certainly a free lunch. Price-benefit sensible, it’s arduous to beat.
David Pilling is the FT’s Africa editor
This text has been modified since authentic publication to make clear the situation of the Copenhagen Consensus Middle
Discover out about our newest tales first — comply with FT Weekend on Instagram and X, and sign up to obtain the FT Weekend e-newsletter each Saturday morning
