The tv information journal 60 Minutes — essentially the most storied and worthwhile present within the historical past of CBS Information — at present finds itself because the avatar of President Trump’s onslaught towards the media within the courts and the court docket of public opinion.
Regardless of courageous speak from the information division, CBS’ dad or mum firm seems to be inching towards capitulation, as its controlling proprietor desires to pull CBS out of the headlines and wrap up a company sale.
Earlier than turning into president, Trump sued CBS over 60 Minutes‘ interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris shortly earlier than the election. Now, Trump’s newly elevated Federal Communications Fee chairman, Brendan Carr, is utilizing the levers of presidency to place strain on the community.
On Monday, at Carr’s request, CBS Information despatched the uncooked footage and the complete transcripts of the interview to the FCC. On Wednesday, the FCC posted it publicly. Carr introduced the company would proceed with a proper investigation, tweeting “The folks can have an opportunity to weigh in.”
CBS published the videos and transcripts shortly after, together with an announcement defending its journalism. It didn’t remark in response to NPR’s questions for this story.
Earlier than Carr’s involvement, CBS had refused to launch these supplies, calling Trump’s demand for them an intrusion on its journalists’ First Modification rights. Democratic Commissioner Anna M. Gomez called the FCC’s investigation a part of “the administration’s concentrate on partisan tradition wars” and urged her fellow commissioners to dismiss it.
“Now, greater than ever, solely a fearless press stands between an aggressive [White House] and the general public,” former CBS Information correspondent Marvin Kalb posted on a Fb web page for CBS alumni. “If information organizations akin to CBS bend a knee earlier than a president, then now we have all taken a giant step in the direction of autocracy.”
The conflict at CBS represents simply the most recent entrance in a multipronged assault on the press waged by the second Trump administration, utilizing litigation, regulatory companies, finances powers, govt prerogatives and sympathetic lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
The specifics hinge on an editorial alternative made by the community. In previewing final fall’s interview with Harris on Face The Nation, CBS used a special portion of her reply to a query about Israel than it used within the lengthier broadcast on 60 Minutes. Trump and his conservative allies alleged that the community had edited the reply to masks her incompetence in an act of partisan bias. (Trump pulled out of an interview with the present, a practice with presidential candidates.)
A CBS company assertion issued final week mentioned the community was legally required to adjust to the request from the FCC chairman, though the network has challenged agency actions in the past. A CBS Information spokesperson didn’t reply to NPR’s requests for remark, together with to the query of why it couldn’t have publicly posted the transcripts earlier by itself authority.
In its assertion Wednesday, CBS mentioned the distinction mirrored an editorial judgment made for 2 separate applications. The complete transcripts present “the 60 Minutes broadcast was not doctored or deceitful,” CBS mentioned within the assertion.
“In reporting the information, journalists usually edit interviews — for time, area or readability,” CBS mentioned. “In making these edits, 60 Minutes is all the time guided by the reality and what we consider will likely be most informative to the viewing public — all whereas working throughout the constraints of broadcast tv.”
CBS’ dad or mum firm seems towards settlement — and a company sale
In response to a number of folks with data of inside deliberations, the community’s company dad or mum Paramount seems poised to settle Trump’s lawsuit, despite the fact that it’s broadly seen as missing authorized benefit. (They requested for anonymity as a result of sensitivity of the topic and the continuing litigation.)
Contained in the newsroom, 60 Minutes Government Producer Invoice Owens has insisted to the present’s employees he will not apologize, in keeping with a number of colleagues. (The remarks had been first reported by The New York Instances.) Equally, the president and chief govt of the information division, Wendy McMahon, has instructed associates she opposes any settlement. A overview of the uncooked transcript exhibits Harris approaching a fragile and complex situation warily, in search of to keep away from any massive headlines.
As FCC chairman, Carr has taken an expansive view of his regulatory powers to exert strain on the media. Within the case of CBS, he has important leverage to take action: Carr and his company are at present weighing whether or not to approve Skydance Media’s acquisition of Paramount, CBS’ dad or mum firm. Neither Carr nor the FCC responded to NPR’s requests for remark.
The company’s energy derives from regulating Paramount’s 27 native tv stations; the transaction would contain the switch of the licenses Paramount holds to Skydance to function them on the general public airwaves. The Justice Division or Federal Commerce Fee might additionally intervene. Federal legal professionals sought to block AT&T’s takeover of CNN’s dad or mum firm throughout Trump’s first time period.
For all the drama, nevertheless, the battle over CBS can’t be seen in isolation.
On the FCC, Carr’s Democratic predecessor dismissed claims involving all 4 main networks — CBS, ABC, NBC and Fox — shortly earlier than leaving workplace. Past CBS, Carr has revived formal evaluations involving the programming decisions of ABC and NBC, although he notably didn’t reignite the grievance about Rupert Murdoch’s Fox station in Philadelphia linked to Fox Information’ amplification of lies of election fraud in 2020.
A full-court press on the press
Extra broadly, the president and his allies are in search of to strain the media writ giant, each to inhibit its potential to verify the president and to punish it for protection he views as unfavorable.
ABC Information’ dad or mum firm, The Walt Disney Co., paid $15 million towards Trump’s future presidential library, plus one other $1 million in authorized prices, to settle Trump’s defamation swimsuit over inaccurate remarks about him by anchor George Stephanopoulos. The social media big Meta paid $25 million to settle Trump’s swimsuit over sidelining him from Fb after the January 2021 siege of the U.S. Capitol.
Washington Publish proprietor Jeff Bezos and Los Angeles Times proprietor Patrick Quickly-Shiong stopped their newspapers from endorsing Harris forward of the 2024 election. They every cited the low esteem during which the media is held by the broader public. Each house owners are billionaires with main enterprise considerations earlier than federal companies; in Amazon founder Bezos’ case, they embody contracts price billions of {dollars}.
In Trump’s first time period, he publicly criticized the potential of Amazon receiving a multibillion-dollar cloud computing contract it anticipated to win from the Pentagon; when it went to Microsoft, Amazon sued and was finally given a share of it.
Bezos sat on the dais throughout Trump’s inauguration with different tech titans. Quickly-Shiong has tweeted energetically in assist of Trump and his nominee to supervise the Division of Well being and Human Companies, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and has patents pending awaiting the overview of federal officers.
Past CBS, Trump nonetheless has lawsuits pending towards Gannett’s Des Moines Register for polling forward of the election that inaccurately discovered Harris within the lead (Trump received Iowa decisively) and the committee that awards Pulitzer Prizes over awards given to protection of the 2016 Trump marketing campaign’s ties to the Russian regime.
“Every settlement weakens the democratic freedoms on which these media organizations rely,” Jameel Jaffer, govt director of the Knight First Modification Institute at Columbia College, writes in the New York Times. “They create precedents — not authorized ones, however precedents nonetheless — that may form the best way that judges and the general public take into consideration press freedom and its limits. In addition they injury the media establishments’ status and credibility.”
The challenges arrive in methods giant and small.
Underneath new Secretary Pete Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, the Protection Division tossed Politico, NPR, the New York Instances and NBC Information from their reserved press areas on the Pentagon in favor of the conservative New York Publish, the right-wing Breitbart and One America Information Community and the liberal HuffPost, a website that, in keeping with a spokesperson, hadn’t requested for a workspace. No press credentials had been revoked; the dislodged retailers can nonetheless go to the Pentagon and report there.
Carr opened an inquiry into NPR and PBS, saying he was involved their company underwriting spots had develop into nearly indistinguishable from commercials. The 2 public broadcasting giants mentioned they had been scrupulous to observe the legislation and steerage from the FCC itself over the many years. Carr used his announcement to induce lawmakers on Capitol Hill to overview whether or not to fund public broadcasting in any respect.
A query to the White Home press secretary
When Trump’s chief spokesperson was requested about authorities spending on information organizations at a information briefing on Wednesday, the query introduced a smile to her lips.
“Popping out right here, to the briefing room, I used to be made conscious of the funding from the U.S. [Agency for International Development] to the media retailers, together with Politico, who I do know has a seat on this room,” White Home Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt instructed reporters. “I can affirm that the greater than 8 million taxpayer {dollars} which have gone basically to subsidizing subscriptions to Politico on the general public taxpayer’s dime will not be taking place.”
Politico’s leaders mentioned in a memo that myriad authorities companies subscribe to Politico Professional, the fact-drenched paid analysis service drawn upon by policymakers and specialists in authorities and the non-public sector alike.
And it’s doing so at a time when authorities officers are promising to slash the budgets of federal agencies performing independent research, pulling back on how much information is available to the public, and firing a slew of inspectors normal, who present Congress and the general public with watchdog stories on what the federal government is doing out of view.
The query was posed to Leavitt by a brand new face within the press room: Brian Glenn, a nationwide correspondent for the far-right Actual America’s Voice community. He’s additionally dating U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican and Trump backer.
Final week, Greene invited the chief executives of NPR and PBS to Capitol Hill for hearings on federal funding for the general public broadcasters over what she mentioned was their “blatantly ideological and partisan protection.” The 2 public broadcasting chiefs mentioned in separate statements that their networks supply unbiased, non-partisan information protection and academic programming for the nation with out price.
“The opposition celebration is the media,” former Trump White Home political strategist Steve Bannon instructed PBS’ Frontline again in 2019, throughout Trump’s first time period in workplace. “And the media can solely — as a result of they’re dumb and so they’re lazy — they’ll solely concentrate on one factor at a time.”
“And all now we have to do is flood the zone,” Bannon mentioned. “Day-after-day we hit them with three issues, they’re going to chew on one, and we’ll get all of our stuff executed.”
Disclosure: This information evaluation was reported and written by NPR Media Correspondent David Folkenflik and edited by Deputy Enterprise Editor Emily Kopp and Managing Editor Gerry Holmes. Underneath NPR’s protocol for reporting on itself, no NPR company official or information govt reviewed this story earlier than it was posted publicly.