On the day of Donald Trump’s second inauguration, an air raid was in impact in Odesa for a lot of the afternoon. Individuals went about their enterprise. Avenue distributors continued promoting espresso. Trams saved working. At Pryvoz, the mammoth farmers’ (and every part else) market, electrical energy went out for some time, however that appeared to don’t have any impact on the tempo of commerce; if it was gradual, that was as a result of it was a Monday. Within the two years and 11 months since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Odesa has gone by way of phases: months of shock and concern, adopted by one thing akin to denial and, lastly, adaptation.
Odesa is a type of cities — like, say, New Orleans — possessed of a definite character, a mythology of itself that fuels a fierce and joyful form of patriotism. Odesa is rightfully happy with its sea views, its structure, its meals, its multiculturalism, its entrepreneurship and its libertine spirit, however its singular distinction is the well-turned phrase, the unsparingly hilarious joke.
Hanna Shelest, a navy analyst, made a type of remarks early on within the battle. As she recalled, not lengthy after Russia invaded, an Italian journalist requested her — in that manner that male journalists “ask” feminine specialists they’re interviewing whereas really telling them what to suppose — “You do notice that you will have to present Putin one thing?” Shelest paused and stated, “You might be proper. We’ll give him Lake Como.” It was an ideal manner of stating the absurdity of the premise, that Ukraine owed Putin one thing simply because he needed it.
I requested Shelest to look at Trump’s inauguration with me. We used the TV in my lodge room. Shelest, who’s 43, and her dad and mom, who’re each 65, have been dwelling in a borrowed residence since a Russian drone hit their constructing on Nov. 14 of final yr. She had simply completed an on-air interview with a French tv channel when she heard a smooth increase, after which the chandelier in her examine fell to the ground, simply lacking her mom. It took all of them a couple of minutes to comprehend that a few of the rooms of their residence had been in ruins, and the residence subsequent door was in flames. Nonetheless, they had been fortunate: The drone didn’t explode. Within the days that adopted, after the fireplace had been put out, Shelest and her mom used a hearth truck’s carry to get into their residence by way of a window to salvage some garments.
“That was form of odd,” Shelest stated when Trump completed his speech. “I’m confused by the emphasis on sovereignty. Is anybody threatening the sovereignty of the US? It’s notably odd watching this from Ukraine, the place we are literally combating for our sovereignty. It has a manner of diminishing our battle.” She was a little bit stunned that Trump didn’t point out Ukraine, although he beforehand promised to finish the Russo-Ukrainian battle inside 24 hours. One would possibly assume that Trump was referring to Ukraine when he complained that the Biden administration had “given limitless funding to the protection of international borders.” She stated a in all probability unintended impact of not mentioning Ukraine by title was that Japan and Taiwan, for instance, in addition to navy contractors, had been placed on discover. “And Panama!” she added. “What did calm, peaceable Panama do?”
To me, all of this sounded acquainted. Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, spent a few years trafficking in imagined grievances and illusory threats to Russian sovereignty. Because it typically has been in historical past, this language was a prelude to launching his ruthless wars. Even Trump’s language concerning the Panama Canal, which he referred to as a “silly present that ought to have by no means been made,” was a direct reprise of Putin’s statements on Crimea, which he repeatedly described as having been a present to Ukraine from Nikita Khrushchev within the Fifties. As is his manner, Trump is transferring quicker than his function mannequin. No sooner had he launched the concept of wounded sovereignty than he promised that “the US will as soon as once more contemplate itself a rising nation — one which will increase our wealth, expands our territory.” Totalitarian leaders, leaders who wish to keep in energy endlessly, undertake expansionist wars.
This axiom of totalitarianism makes it unlikely that Trump will be capable of ship on his promise to finish the battle in Ukraine. Putin wants this battle.
Putin additionally needs a summit with Trump, which seems to be on monitor to occur this yr. A gathering with the U.S. president would sign an finish to the interval of worldwide isolation Russia entered after it invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
A gathering with Trump wouldn’t solely present Russians — and the remainder of the world — that Putin is as soon as once more a professional voice on the earth; it will additionally give him what he has lengthy demanded: a dialog concerning the destiny of Ukraine that doesn’t embody Ukraine. Within the week earlier than Trump’s inauguration, some high-level Russian officers made aggressive statements indicating that Ukraine shouldn’t exist in any respect.
For a lot of the previous three years, the Kremlin has both flat-out refused to enter talks on an finish to the battle or made calls for for territory that far exceeded what Russia had been in a position to occupy. If any talks occur, Shelest stated, Russia shall be not find a sustainable answer however simply in maximizing its personal place.
However Shelest hopes that Putin will overplay his hand. He’s nicely on his manner. Final month a Russian oligarch and Putin booster instructed The Monetary Occasions that Russia would merely make a present of reviewing Trump’s peace plan for Ukraine, then reject it. (In response, the Trump adviser Keith Kellogg, showing on Fox Information, mysteriously directed the oligarch to “get again in your field.”) Prior to now, Putin has typically indicated that he has a low opinion of Trump’s intelligence. “He could also be tempted to humiliate Trump, to place him in his place,” Shelest stated.
May that get Trump’s ire up? “Perhaps he’ll determine that he needs to be a victor,” Shelest stated. Perhaps he’ll give Ukraine what the Biden administration has held again: sufficient navy assets and the liberty to make use of them to actually harm Russia. It’s a hell of a factor to see Trump’s propensity to behave out of spite as your nation’s finest hope.
An hour after Shelest left my lodge room, the air raid siren went off once more.
M. Gessen is an Opinion columnist for The Occasions. They gained a George Polk Award for opinion writing in 2024. They’re the writer of “The Future Is Historical past: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia,” which gained the Nationwide Ebook Award in 2017, and different books.
The Occasions is dedicated to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you concentrate on this or any of our articles. Listed below are some tips. And right here’s our e mail: letters@nytimes.com.
Comply with the New York Occasions Opinion part on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, X and Threads.
