For years Russia and Syria have been key companions – Moscow gained entry to Mediterranean air and sea bases whereas Damascus acquired army assist for its combat towards insurgent forces.
Now, after the autumn of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, many Syrians need to see Russian forces depart however their interim authorities says it’s open to additional cooperation.
“Russia’s crimes right here have been indescribable,” says Ahmed Taha, a insurgent commander in Douma, six miles north-east of the capital Damascus.
The town was as soon as a affluent place in a area often called the “bread basket” of Damascus. And Ahmed Taha was as soon as a civilian, working as a tradesman when he took up arms towards the Assad regime following the brutal suppression of protests in 2011.
Whole residential districts in Douma now lie in ruins after among the fiercest preventing in Syria’s nearly 14-year civil conflict.
Moscow entered this battle in 2015 to assist the regime when it was shedding floor. Russia’s International Minister Sergey Lavrov later claimed that, on the time of the intervention, Damascus was simply weeks away from being overrun by rebels.
The Syrian operation confirmed the ambition of Russia’s President Vladimir Putin to be taken extra significantly after the widespread worldwide condemnation of his annexation of Crimea.
Moscow claimed to have examined 320 totally different weapons in Syria.
It additionally secured 49-year leases on two army bases on the Mediterranean coast – the Tartus naval base and the Hmeimim air base. This allowed the Kremlin to quickly increase its affect in Africa, serving as a spring board for Russian operations in Libya, the Central African Republic, Mali, and Burkina Faso.
Regardless of the assist of Russia and Iran, Assad couldn’t forestall his regime from collapsing. However Moscow supplied refuge to him and his household.
Now, many Syrian civilians and insurgent fighters see Russia as an confederate of the Assad regime that helped destroy their homeland.
“The Russians got here to this nation and helped the tyrants, oppressors, and invaders,” says Abu Hisham, as he celebrated the autumn of the regime in Damascus.
The Kremlin has at all times denied that, saying it solely focused jihadist teams like IS or al-Qaeda.
However the United Nations and human rights teams accused the regime and Russia of committing conflict crimes.
In 2016, throughout an assault on densely populated Japanese Aleppo, Syrian and Russian forces carried out relentless air strikes, “claiming lots of of lives and decreasing hospitals, faculties and markets to rubble,” in keeping with a UN report.
In Aleppo, Douma and elsewhere, the regime forces besieged rebel-held areas, reducing off meals and medication provides, and proceeded to bomb them till armed opposition teams surrendered.
Russia additionally negotiated ceasefires and offers for the give up of rebel-held cities and cities, reminiscent of Douma in 2018.
Ahmed Taha was among the many rebels there who agreed to give up in trade for protected passage out of the town following a five-year siege by the Syrian military.
He returned to Douma in December as part of the insurgent offensive led by the Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and its chief Ahmed al-Sharaa.
“We’re again dwelling regardless of Russia, regardless of the regime and all those that supported it,” says Taha.
He has little doubt the Russians ought to depart: “For us, Russia is an enemy.”
It is a sentiment echoed by many individuals we converse to.
Even leaders of Syria’s Christian communities, who Russia vowed to guard, say they’d little assist from Moscow.
In Bab Touma, the traditional Christian quarter of Damascus, the Patriarch of the Syriac Orthodox Church says: “We didn’t have the expertise of Russia or anyone else from the surface world defending us.”
“The Russians have been right here for their very own advantages and objectives,” Ignatius Aphrem II tells the BBC.
Different Syrian Christians have been much less diplomatic.
“Once they got here at first, they stated: ‘We got here right here that will help you,'” says a person known as Assad. “However as a substitute of serving to us, they destroyed Syria much more.”
Sharaa, now Syria’s de facto chief, stated in a BBC interview last month that he would not rule out permitting the Russians to remain, and he described relations between the 2 nations as “strategic”.
Moscow seized on his phrases, with international minister Lavrov agreeing Russia “had a lot in widespread with our Syrian buddies”.
However untangling the ties in a post-Assad future might not be simple.
Rebuilding Syria’s army would require both a very new begin or a continued reliance on Russian provides, which might imply no less than some sort of relationship between the 2 nations, says Turki al-Hassan, a defence analyst and retired Syrian military common.
Syria’s army cooperation with Moscow predates the Assad regime, Hassan says. Just about all of the tools it has was produced by the Soviet Union or Russia, he explains.
“From its inception, the Syrian military has been armed with Japanese Bloc weapons.”
Between 1956 and 1991 Syria acquired some 5,000 tanks, 1,200 fighter plane, 70 ships and lots of different techniques and weapons from Moscow price over $26bn (£21bn), in keeping with Russian estimates.
Plenty of this was in assist of Syria’s wars with Israel, which has largely outlined the nation’s international coverage because it gained independence from France in 1946.
Greater than half of that sum was left unpaid when the Soviet Union collapsed however in 2005 president Putin wrote off 73% of the debt.
For now, Russian officers have taken a conciliatory however cautious method in the direction of the interim rulers who toppled Russia’s long-standing ally.
Vassily Nebenzia, Moscow’s UN envoy, stated latest occasions had marked a brand new part within the historical past of what he known as “brotherly Syrian folks”. He stated Russia would offer each humanitarian assist and assist for reconstruction to permit Syrian refugees to return dwelling.