To the editor: I like the form of defiance proven by the individuals mountain climbing the paths closed on Mt. Baldy after the Bridge hearth. Because the saying goes, you possibly can’t repair silly. (“The feds closed Mt. Baldy to hiking until December 2025. Rebellion is brewing,” Dec. 18)
I assist construct trails. I assist shut trails that want time for nature to restore them. I reroute trails to make them extra accessible. I’m educated in path psychology.
There are lots of causes trails get closed, erosion being probably the most damaging. If these courageous hikers proceed to stroll a closed path, they’re simply dooming their very own stroll.
To these hikers, I say: Let nature take again the paths. It should make your stroll extra gratifying. In case you can’t maintain your self off these closed mountain climbing trails, volunteer and discover ways to work on them. I’m positive you could find a path crew that wants assist.
Then you possibly can stroll the paths and perceive what harm you might have been doing. And you may restore them.
Tim Ashford, Lomita
..
To the editor: I used to be dissatisfied that this text on a sound topic for dialogue leaves one with the impression that nobody is allowed to hike within the Mt. Baldy space.
The Mt. Baldy “notch” and the grime highway that results in it are usually not within the “coronary heart” of the closure space; they’re on the japanese edge, simply outdoors it.
The article quotes a resident of Mt. Baldy Village complaining she can not go for a hike with out clarifying that the complete east aspect of the Baldy canyon is open, together with the Three Ts path, Icehouse Canyon and Stoddard Canyon.
We are able to talk about whether or not the path closures to the Mt. Baldy peak and the variance for the ski slopes are justified with out leaving readers with the impression that the entire space is closed when it isn’t.
Brent Jacobson, Chino Hills
